Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-29-2011, 06:47 PM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,510,143 times
Reputation: 3899

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nocontengencies View Post
Yes, public land is owned by the tax payers. All of them. It is infringing on the rights of others if you occupy any of the public land for days at a time in a tent as though it is your own. Or if you store your belongings there, same difference. Do you think these two pay much as far as taxes anyhow? I don't.

Their books were removed for the same reason I can't open my own business out of a tent in the parking lot of the county court house. What don't you understand?

Your rights end, where mine begin.

It is sickening how people are so quick to judge....IE: Do you think these two pay much in taxes?

You people are ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-29-2011, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,510,143 times
Reputation: 3899
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
It was a collection of books, taking up space on land THAT DOESNT BELONG TO THEM

That doesnt mean you can do whatever the hell you want on it

Why not? You said one can do whatever they want on public land, so why cant I open up a Bed & Breakfast at the White House?

I dont need my children, they however need me, without me, my children wouldnt exist, according to your rationality, my children cant own property Where do you live, North Korea?


It was public land that they rights to. I did not say that one can do whatever they want....what I said was they did not build a physical library and possessing books on public property is not illegal.

So you think the government does not need its people? You beeter think thst through and perhaps read history and the founding documents of this country before answering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 06:52 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,464,507 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
So they can not have books on this property?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
They did not build a physical library, it was a collection of books. which by definition is what a library is.

PUBLIC land is owned by the tax payers genius.

You can't even compare apples to apples.
Permits are not limited to the construction of a structure. Permits can apply to land uses (permanent or temporary). Storage of materials, such as books, is a land use. Operation of a library is a land use.

Enough speculation. Let's simply review the document that governs the park:


Per Section 608-7 Encoachment of the Toronto Municipal Code - Parks:

Quote:
Unless authorized by permit, no person shall encroach upon or take possession of a park by any means whatsoever including the construction, installation or maintenance of a fence or structure, the dumping or storage of materials or plantings, or planting, cultivating, grooming or landscaping.

Per Section 608 - 9 Access of the Toronto Municipal Code - Parks:

Quote:
B. Unless authorized by permit, no person shall use, enter, or gather in a park between the hours of 12:01 a.m. and 5:30 a.m.

Per Section 608 - 11 Organized gatherings, special events, festivals, and picnics of the Toronto Municipal Code - Parks:

Quote:
While in a park, no person shall:

A. Unless authorized by permit, hold a picnic, organized gathering or special event for more than 25 persons.

Per Section 608 - 13 Camping and lodging of the Toronto Municipal Code - Parks:

Quote:
Unless authorized by permit, no person shall dwell, camp, or lodge in a park.

source: http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/municode/1184_608.pdf


[as a group of people who wanted to share information through reading, the first thing they should have read was the law]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,464,507 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
It was public land that they rights to. I did not say that one can do whatever they want....what I said was they did not build a physical library and possessing books on public property is not illegal.

So you think the government does not need its people? You beeter think thst through and perhaps read history and the founding documents of this country before answering.
This occurred in Canada so the founding documents of this country do not apply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 06:57 PM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,510,143 times
Reputation: 3899
In Canada just as here in the US your Constitutional rights supercede municipal rule. Guess that is why it is in court.



Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKEETC View Post
Permits are not limited to the construction of a structure. Permits can apply to land uses (permanent or temporary). Storage of materials, such as books, is a land use. Operation of a library is a land use.

Enough speculation. Let's simply review the document that governs the park:


Per Section 608-7 Encoachment of the Toronto Municipal Code - Parks:




Per Section 608 - 9 Access of the Toronto Municipal Code - Parks:




Per Section 608 - 11 Organized gatherings, special events, festivals, and picnics of the Toronto Municipal Code - Parks:




Per Section 608 - 13 Camping and lodging of the Toronto Municipal Code - Parks:




source: http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/municode/1184_608.pdf


[as a group of people who wanted to share information through reading, the first thing they should have read was the law]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,510,143 times
Reputation: 3899
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKEETC View Post
This occurred in Canada so the founding documents of this country do not apply.

The founding documents do apply to that particular part of the conversation. Keep up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 06:58 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,077,144 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
Your rights end, where mine begin.

It is sickening how people are so quick to judge....IE: Do you think these two pay much in taxes?

You people are ridiculous.
And your rights end when I'm occupying land so you cant use it
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
It was public land that they rights to.
You have no rights to land THATS NOT YOURS.. How old are you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
I did not say that one can do whatever they want....what I said was they did not build a physical library and possessing books on public property is not illegal.
But clealy you believed they can do whatever they wanted which happened to be storing books on land not owned by then. yes it is illegal to occupy land thats NOT YOURS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
So you think the government does not need its people? You beeter think thst through and perhaps read history and the founding documents of this country before answering.
Who said government doesnt need the people? Because government needs me, I can now operate a Bed and Breakfast in the White House? Where does the Constitution allow me to occupy the White House?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 07:00 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,077,144 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
In Canada just as here in the US your Constitutional rights supercede municipal rule. Guess that is why it is in court.
What part of the Constitution says you can occupy land that YOU DONT OWN?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,510,143 times
Reputation: 3899
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
What part of the Constitution says you can occupy land that YOU DONT OWN?

The First Amendment gives us the right to peaceful assembly.


Are you seriously that corrupted?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,464,507 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
In Canada just as here in the US your Constitutional rights supercede municipal rule. Guess that is why it is in court.
These rules are under Constitutional challenge? Provide the link because that would be interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top