Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-02-2011, 03:42 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,874,717 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Just a friendly update.

The judge in Crawford County, Illinois who heard this case ruled that the Illinois Eavesdropping Law was Unconstitutional. That decision was handed down November 9th. The DA in Crawford County has evidently filed an appeal on that ruling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-02-2011, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,289,159 times
Reputation: 1333
I really hate this law. I think that it's just a way to give the police more of a chance to harass you. If I remember correctly, the reasoning for this law was because the police were getting caught on video too often doing bad things and they didn't want them on video anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2011, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,024 posts, read 14,201,797 times
Reputation: 16747
When rights become privileges, no one has "the right" to anything without government permission.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2011, 04:58 PM
 
43 posts, read 23,021 times
Reputation: 13
Illinois has a terrible law. Rather then trying to decrease examples of police breaking the law or decrease police brutality they have made it illegal for someone to collect evidence that police have broken the law. That's a retarded thing to do and the supreme court needs to strike down this clearly unconstitutional law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2011, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,184,746 times
Reputation: 6958
Sounds like something from Stalin era USSR.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2011, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Do you know when you make a call on your cellphone the government can record you if they want.
That is because the "expectation" of a cell phone user is that they are using public airspace.

Seems there's a set of laws for the government and another more restrictive laws for us mere peons.

So police doing their duty publicly have an "expectation of privacy" ?

Feds push for tracking cell phones | Politics and Law - CNET News
"..Americans enjoy no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in their--or at least their cell phones'--whereabouts. U.S. Department of Justice lawyers say that "a customer's Fourth Amendment rights are not violated when the phone company reveals to the government its own records" that show where a mobile device placed and received calls."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2011, 05:12 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,003,124 times
Reputation: 5455
I believe the first circuit court of appeals ruled it's ok to videotape oinkers while on duty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2011, 05:46 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Puppy View Post
The ACORN footage was not obtained outdoors. The law cited isn't about video footage but audio. Some states allow you to record as long as you notify the party. Perhaps this is why the cops can get away with it, and then you have the patriot act which bascially allows the government to violate your privacy at will.
The video tapes in question was taken IN THE PUBLIC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2011, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
The video tapes in question was taken IN THE PUBLIC.
And they should parrot just what the Federal Government says...

The police should have "no reasonable expectation of privacy" when in public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2011, 05:51 PM
 
45,225 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24980
The government hates transparency.
I seem to remember a certain Illinois senator who was going to change that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top