Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem
Where the heck would a rail line go? We have enough issue with them widening the 405 at Sepulveda. Rail is not practical on the westside.
|
Freeways aren't practical on the westside either, maybe the 405 should be torn down. Or even better, it never should have been built, nor should the 10 have been built, considering what was destroyed to build both.
If that rail line going down Lincoln would have been built it would have been used.
Quote:
Rail is not practical anywhere in Los Angeles. Nobody uses it as it stands now, because it doesn't GO anywhere useful for the majority of people in the most congested corridors.
|
If you lived closer to the Metro you wouldn't say this. Driving in Los Angeles has become a nightmare, buses don't work because they use the same roads as cars, and not having rail is not practical for L.A.
The only reason it 'doesn't go anywhere useful for the majority of people in the most congested corridors" is because right now it does not go west of Highland Avenue. (And in what universe is the Hollywood/Highland area not one of the most congested corridors in L.A.?)