Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2011, 10:16 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,870,989 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
How much do the Residents of this burg pay for the Police? For educating their children to be just like them. For operating a library (probably don't know how to read anyway) For fixing the roads or tending the jail.
I think the comment, "probably don't know how to read anyway," is highly offensive. These are just normal people, trying to get by. Someone who espouses socialist sensibilities should really try to empathize with these people. Think about why some rural people make the choices the do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-07-2011, 10:40 AM
 
16,212 posts, read 10,819,047 times
Reputation: 8442
They should have paid the fee. It is only $75.

But if people have neighbors what will the firefighters do. Let all the houses next to the burning one become damaged even if those residents have paid? I would have paid the fee but I also feel the local community should just automatically charge everyone the fee as it is in the best interest of the community to have sufficient public safety workers.

For me this is not a political left/right issue. It is better to protect the whole community from something that can spread, like fire, than to let there be gaps and potentially cause property damage against those that did pay. Those who are damaged could potentially have a case against the local authorities for not providing adequate services for their money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 10:53 AM
 
4,255 posts, read 3,479,228 times
Reputation: 992
Actualy that is why they were on the scene, to make sure it didnt spread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 10:55 AM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,397,659 times
Reputation: 8691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
1. The homeowners insurance is paid by the homeowner. Did you want to simply add the 75 $ to what the owner pays the insurance company?
Depending on the individual policy of insurance (though $75.00 would be within most people's policy deductible), the firefighting bill may very well be a recoverable cost to remediate a peril covered under the policy (fire loss).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt
2. PAY AFTER the service is rendered? That's kinda like offering to pay an insurance company for insurance, AFTER you had an accident to get them to pay to fix the car...
Again, firefighting service is NOT INSURANCE.

INSURANCE addresses PAYMENT for remediation of damages AFTER an emergency or casualty.

FIREFIGHTING SERVICE (like medical service) addresses the emergency AS IT HAPPENS, or immediately after the emergency to mitigate damages.

This isn't a situation of having insurance vs. not having insurance. This is about STOPPING an emergency event or casualty AS IT HAPPENS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt
A civilized society expect people to be responsible for their actions.
CIvilized society is civilized BECAUSE it recognizes that people are not perfect, and attempts to have an orderly organization based on that truth. It's why even visitors to a city are afforded police protection, even though they pay no tax for maintenance of said police force. It's why school children are sent to school, even if their parents are behind on property tax.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt
If you can't take be responsible enough to put tires on your car, they are going to either go flat or cause an accident.
Not analagous.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt
If you don't pay your insurance policy, they aren't going to cover you,
Not analgous.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt
and if your fire department is in ANOTHER COUNTY, and they request you pay 75$ a year, (A whopping $6.25 a month) to respond to a fire at your home, you pay the money, or don't expect service.
Wrong. If the firefighters SHOW UP and WATCH and DO NOTHING as a home is burned... when they have ALREADY expended man and equipment hours to GET THERE, then they, in my opinion, void whatever the firefighting oath is.

Morally bankrupt. Somethings are just RIGHT, even if not provided for by contract.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 10:58 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,870,989 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by residinghere2007 View Post
They should have paid the fee. It is only $75.

But if people have neighbors what will the firefighters do. Let all the houses next to the burning one become damaged even if those residents have paid? I would have paid the fee but I also feel the local community should just automatically charge everyone the fee as it is in the best interest of the community to have sufficient public safety workers.

For me this is not a political left/right issue. It is better to protect the whole community from something that can spread, like fire, than to let there be gaps and potentially cause property damage against those that did pay. Those who are damaged could potentially have a case against the local authorities for not providing adequate services for their money.
The local community cannot just decide to charge people who don't live in the community fees or taxes. These people live OUTSIDE the community. The people IN the community have voted to pay a tax that supports the VOLUNTEER fire department in the community. The people IN the community have offered to people who live OUTSIDE the community to extend the firefighting services to their residences and businesses, if the people OUTSIDE the community pay a small fee to subscribe to the firefighting service.

The county can allow all the people living within the county to vote if they want to pay these fees as taxes. The county can't just arbitrarily decide to add taxes to county residents tax bills. It requires the people of the county to vote for such taxes. And many won't vote for such taxes, because it doesn't benefit them. If the fire department can't get to you within a certain amount of time, your house will burn down. That's a fact of rural living. If the only water source is your well, your house will burn down. Many rural residents don't pay the voluntary fees because it simply makes no difference. The fire department cannot respond quickly and doesn't have the resources to put out a fire if the homeowner can't put out the fire himself with the garden hose. Why pay for a service that is ineffectual?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,729,686 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
The answer from the left...."It's not fair!"
Are we reading the same thread? B/C I haven't seen that in the first six posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 11:00 AM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,727,118 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Because a rural Tennessee county would be a bastion of liberalism?
They had Al Gore as a Senator so there was a "bation" somewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 11:02 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,870,989 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7 View Post
Depending on the individual policy of insurance (though $75.00 would be within most people's policy deductible), the firefighting bill may very well be a recoverable cost to remediate a peril covered under the policy (fire loss).



Again, firefighting service is NOT INSURANCE.

INSURANCE addresses PAYMENT for remediation of damages AFTER an emergency or casualty.

FIREFIGHTING SERVICE (like medical service) addresses the emergency AS IT HAPPENS, or immediately after the emergency to mitigate damages.

This isn't a situation of having insurance vs. not having insurance. This is about STOPPING an emergency event or casualty AS IT HAPPENS.



CIvilized society is civilized BECAUSE it recognizes that people are not perfect, and attempts to have an orderly organization based on that truth. It's why even visitors to a city are afforded police protection, even though they pay no tax for maintenance of said police force. It's why school children are sent to school, even if their parents are behind on property tax.



Not analagous.



Not analgous.



Wrong. If the firefighters SHOW UP and WATCH and DO NOTHING as a home is burned... when they have ALREADY expended man and equipment hours to GET THERE, then they, in my opinion, void whatever the firefighting oath is.

Morally bankrupt. Somethings are just RIGHT, even if not provided for by contract.
Firefighting service is not insurance.

Firefighting service is also not a right.

If you want firefighting service to be provided, you pay for it in advance. Just like if you want insurance coverage, you pay for it in advance. If you don't pay for the firefighting service, why should anyone else? If no one pays for the firefighting service, how would it be available, to anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 11:03 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,870,989 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
They had Al Gore as a Senator so there was a "bation" somewhere.
Twenty years ago, they had Al Gore as a Senator.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Old Town Alexandria
14,492 posts, read 26,591,034 times
Reputation: 8971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
Maybe the homeowners are Republican and do not want their taxes going to "parasitic union thugs (public workers)who suck up all their taxes"....so they may have been HAPPY not to have to pay firefighters....as Republicans do, they may have wanted something for nothing.
Owe you another +.

lmfao-Kuchief...a CASINO in Paducah ???? wow.

Those Appalachians prolly vote (R) and GOP and look at the contempt you have for them. Plus they prolly dont have 75.00. Visit Church Hill, Tennessee sometime. Yes they sure do live the high life there
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top