Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which proposal do you support with the tax cut issue?
The middle class should get a $1,500 tax cut. They need it now more than ever. 18 90.00%
The middle class should pay an extra $1,000 to keep the tax cuts for the wealthy. They need it more. 2 10.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618

Advertisements

get rid of the DISCRIMINATORY prorated income tax. that doesnt tax at EQUAL rates

tax spending ,,not income..especially since a good portion of income is never reported


tax everyone at the same rate...or dont tax at all
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:40 PM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,622,568 times
Reputation: 1544
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Too bad the OP still has not learned to post an unbiased poll. The "middle class tax cut" places Social Security in further financial jeopardy.
No, it doesn't.

that myth has been debunked, but like most left vs. right debates, i guess that's how this is going to go: just maintain your own set of facts.

a dollar is fungible; a dollar of revenue taxed from corporate income or capital gains is just as valuable as a dollar taxed by payroll taxes. Nothing is in jeapordy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,457,651 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Awreetus-Awrightus View Post
No, it doesn't.
Really? The SS trust fund already doesn't have enough money to pay SS benefits. We're already at the point of having to pay SS benefits from the general fund (i.e., money we don't have). If the payroll tax cut wasn't extended, then we'd possibly have a few years where that might not be the case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Awreetus-Awrightus View Post
No, it doesn't.

that myth has been debunked, but like most left vs. right debates, i guess that's how this is going to go: just maintain your own set of facts.
false

SS 2 years ago(fy09) started taking in LESS than it was putting out...

the 2% lowering put it FURTHER in the red
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:47 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,809,014 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Too bad the OP still has not learned to post an unbiased poll. The "middle class tax cut" places Social Security in further financial jeopardy. The payroll taxcut failed to stimulate the economy and yet Obamabots want the same failed policies over and over again.
Fail, there is nothing biased about the poll or thread. No "side" is even directly mentioned. Also to most average americans, an extra $1,000 is quite a bit of money, and would hurt quite a bit if it was taken away,..

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Why does Obama want to destroy Social Security?
False and debunked right wing talking point. If you want to talk about attacks on social security and medicare, just take a look at virtually every GOP/tea party fiscal proposal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:47 PM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,622,568 times
Reputation: 1544
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
Really? The SS trust fund already doesn't have enough money to pay SS benefits. We're already at the point of having to pay SS benefits from the general fund (i.e., money we don't have).
The general fund is not "money we don't have." That is, in fact, the complete opposite of what the general fund is. The general fund is the money that we're going to spend.

And the Social Security Trust Fund does not have any assets! It is a trick used to convince old people that their was "money saved away." There is no money saved away. That might've been how things worked many, many years ago, but the past politicians of the 80's and 90's needed to find a way to keep capital gains taxes and corporate taxes low. So.. they diverted payroll tax revenues (middle class revenues) to help fund the general fund, so "certain people" could have their tax rates lowered.

That's ancient history, though, and no reason at all to continue the payroll tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
Fail, there is nothing biased about the poll or thread. No "side" is even directly mentioned. Also to most average americans, an extra $1,000 is quite a bit of money, and would hurt quite a bit if it was taken away,..


.
oh please

the lower part of the middleclass (those unde 50k) dont even pay federal income taxes

I know..I earn 60k and pay NOTHING in federal taxes (income or payroll)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:55 PM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,203,345 times
Reputation: 3411
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkm370 View Post
raise taxes, the middle class in this country barely pays any taxes. Enough already.
Oh really? We're paying 33% in federal income taxes alone (we actually work for a living), and we sure as heck aren't rich. On top of that, start adding in state taxes, payroll taxes, sales tax and property tax....

If we lived off of investment income, we'd be paying 15%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:55 PM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,622,568 times
Reputation: 1544
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
false

SS 2 years ago(fy09) started taking in LESS than it was putting out...

the 2% lowering put it FURTHER in the red
So what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:59 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,809,014 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
oh please

the lower part of the middleclass (those unde 50k) dont even pay federal income taxes

I know..I earn 60k and pay NOTHING in federal taxes (income or payroll)
With that salary you fit right in the middle class. Now the question, do you support getting a $1,500 tax cut, or would you rather have a $1,000 tax increase so the wealthy can have it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top