Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Nice - namecalling. I know, it's all the libs have.
I have a question for you - would you be willing to support a civil union that has every right afforded to a married couple? Or MUST it be called marriage?
ringwise, if you'd be so kind to address the following...
They mean that gays can marry people of the opposite sex, "just like heterosexuals can!" which is just plain ignorant. Basically, they want heterosexuals to be able to marry whoever they're attracted to (so long as they're of legal age to consent, unrelated, and unmarried) but not let homosexuals marry who they're attracted to (even if they're of legal age to consent, unrelated, and unmarried).
Reasons?
They THINK the bible tells them to keep gays (and only gays) from being allowed to marry, or justifies this blatant prejudice.
They THINK homosexuality is harmful in some way, though the evidence seems to contradict that, especially in regards to gay parenting.
And they THINK homosexuality is nothing more than lust, even though gays have shown that they are just as likely as (if not MORE likely than) heterosexuals of making a marriage last.
Basically, any sort of false/unverifiable claim they can provide, or protections of general legal freedoms they can hide behind such as "freedom of religious belief" or "freedom of speech"; that's what they think justifies discriminating against homosexuals.
Nice - namecalling. I know, it's all the libs have.
I have a question for you - would you be willing to support a civil union that has every right afforded to a married couple? Or MUST it be called marriage?
Didn't the US try the "separate but equal" thing already? Why should we do it again?
Would you be willing to let gays get married and straights only have civil unions? Goose and gander, right?
If you're about to tell us that eating Chick-Fil-A is the exception to the rule "Fast food is fattening", I will officially have reason to lose faith in all humanity.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Could this be true? I'm not sure that I'd want to accept their food if I were them. They'd probably use spoiled chicken and stale waffle fries to give to the gays.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
