Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2011, 06:59 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,555,443 times
Reputation: 3602

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Actually, S. 1867 does reference the Taliban, specifically.

Next time you might want to actually read the legislation.

As I said in my previous post, by passing S. 1867 with a veto-proof majority in the Senate, and only six votes shy of a veto-proof majority in the House, Congress is reaffirming that the US is still in a state of war with both al Qaeda and the Taliban, specifically. At the same time they are ensuring that Obama will not veto the bill. No President is going to veto a bill that passes Congress with a veto-proof majority, or just short of one. That would be politically stupid, and a waste of time.
Florida Bob is not one to ever let facts get in the way of his opinions, ever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2011, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Actually, S. 1867 does reference the Taliban, specifically.

Next time you might want to actually read the legislation.

As I said in my previous post, by passing S. 1867 with a veto-proof majority in the Senate, and only six votes shy of a veto-proof majority in the House, Congress is reaffirming that the US is still in a state of war with both al Qaeda and the Taliban, specifically. At the same time they are ensuring that Obama will not veto the bill. No President is going to veto a bill that passes Congress with a veto-proof majority, or just short of one. That would be politically stupid, and a waste of time.
I don't know why my search did not find the word "Taliban", but regardless, I hope you don't read Sect 1031 (b)(2) to mean all Taliban people participated in or supporting terrorist acts. Now, Al Qaeda ...it's likely that whatever is left of them, do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,161,091 times
Reputation: 15546
The Taliban is the enemy. Biden is lacking common sense. The taliban is an extremist group that kills civilians ,very radical pushing sharia law against women and is an evil force in the world.

They are supporting terrorism against us.

Biden is making himself to be an idiot as usual and anyone who backs up what he says sounds just as bad.

Ask the soldiers who fought against the taliban? What do you think they will say? Friend or foe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 07:44 AM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,972,261 times
Reputation: 1748
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb View Post
You need to do some research before you spout off on this one. He's right. Most people who are informed about the situation over there, regardless of political affiliation, agree with him on this.
So ... Its our friends ... our buddies the Taliban ... who are killing our troops ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 07:47 AM
 
Location: Miami, FL
8,087 posts, read 9,839,139 times
Reputation: 6650
We were allies with the USSR in WWII and then we fought a very long and expensive Cold War with them during which we also negotiated on different subjects with them. So why is it hypocritical to seek a negotiation with the Taliban?

We did the same when fighting various tribes of Indians in the U.S. West. Fought and negotiated against groups who also targeted civilians. Philippine Insurrectos leader Emilio Aguinaldo, who fought the U.S. in our other guerrilla war to include a significant number of Muslims, later became President of the Phillippines and worked alongside U.S. occupation forces.

Taliban harbored Al-Queda. I do recall President Bush saying that states which did so would be declared hostile but I think we have learned a great deal of the limits and consequences of projecing overt U.S. power. In the Cold War days they would have been infiltrated and selectively assassinated.

Last edited by Felix C; 12-20-2011 at 08:10 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 07:58 AM
 
4,173 posts, read 6,687,211 times
Reputation: 1216
AQ has been reduced to a number around 100 for a few years. Many think AQ has actually morphed into Taliban.
(After bin Laden: Why the Taliban won't sever ties with Al Qaeda - CSMonitor.com)

President Obama's Secret: Only 100 Al Qaeda Now in Afghanistan

Taliban is becoming more agressive against US.
BBC News - Shift in Taliban tactics alarms Afghanistan government

US and Taliban are negotiating - and that is OK (aside: we, israelis, etc - everyone negotiates with terrorists excepting when asking for votes). Just dont sell us on Taliban not being one of the major reasons we are there now since the AQ people have been reduced to a handful a while back.

Last edited by calmdude; 12-20-2011 at 08:09 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 08:10 AM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
The taliban is an extremist group that kills civilians ,very radical pushing sharia law against women and is an evil force in the world.
What does that have to do with whether they are our enemies or not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by doctrain View Post
“A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.”
"So the vice president claims the Taliban is not really a U.S. enemy. But a bill just passed Congress says any form of support to the Taliban would effectively make anyone a terrorist stripped of their civilian rights and detained indefinitely under military jurisdiction."
OK, I was wrong on that. Thanks for clearing it up.

I would say that makes it a worse bill than I thought it was, and you are right, Biden ought to be made to explain himself--but for supporting the bill, not for his off-the-cuff comment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 12:19 PM
 
5,756 posts, read 3,998,245 times
Reputation: 2308
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Osama bin Laden created al Qaeda in 1994, six years after the CIA left Afghanistan, and five years after the USSR fell. al Qaeda had absolutely nothing to do with the Soviet Union. It has been a terrorist organization from the beginning, receiving the majority of its funding from Saudi charities. Again, the CIA had nothing to do with al Qaeda or Osama.
Osama and his evil cohorts didn't like the idea of the infidels [US] being on Holy ground when Saddam invaded Kuwait. The Saudis invited US and rejected Osama and his fighters which has more to do with his terrorist group.He figured if he brought [in his own mind] one super power down it would work again.Now he swims with the fishy's along with his dream of a world united by Radical Islam.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,452,578 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumbdowndemocrats View Post
Osama and his evil cohorts didn't like the idea of the infidels [US] being on Holy ground when Saddam invaded Kuwait. The Saudis invited US and rejected Osama and his fighters which has more to do with his terrorist group.He figured if he brought [in his own mind] one super power down it would work again.Now he swims with the fishy's along with his dream of a world united by Radical Islam.
That is very true, and Osama bin Laden's biggest beef was with Saudi Arabia. The US and our "western allies" were added on to his February 23, 1998 Fatah only after he expounded upon his greviances with Saudi Arabia.

Most are probably not aware that Saudi Arabia has been hit repeatedly by al Qaeda since 1998. More than any other nation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top