Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So it doesn't matter that Ron helped found the company that wrote the newsletter, put his name to it, promoted it (TV and print), ran it on a day to day basis, and paid the writer(s) for nearly 20 years? Only the person who wrote the original article bears any responsibility at all for the content?
Wow, that's astonishing.
He has taken responsibility. He didn't write it, so why should he take responsibility for the views written? He HAS taken responsibility for letting them get published.
Well, he started and ran the company expressly to publish and promote those views. This wasn't some rogue writer.
I thought that would be obvious to a 6 year old.
Not many people would found and run a company, while while using their face to promote things they don't believe in for nearly 2 decades.
I'm done explaining these things. He said he didn't usually read them. So he didn't know what was being published, which he has taken responsibility for.
So it doesn't matter that Ron helped found the company that wrote the newsletter, put his name to it, promoted it (TV and print), ran it on a day to day basis, and paid the writer(s) for nearly 20 years? Only the person who wrote the original article bears any responsibility at all for the content?
Wow, that's astonishing.
He said he didn't know about it until 10 years after they were published...and he has been saying ever since then that he takes responsibility for the lack of oversight in their publishing that content. So yeah, once he was aware of the issue he addressed it...again, how do you propose he solves the problem to your satisfaction?
Additionally, did you even read the bullet points I posted earlier in this thread, they raise some pretty basic questions that make any "Ron Paul is a racist" claim pretty difficult to prove...yet no legitimate news source is even touching those items.
If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck....it's a duck!
Exactly, and his libertarian view that says that EVERYONE regardless of race, religion, or sex has the same rights in this country should tell you that he is not a racist.
I'm done explaining these things. He said he didn't usually read them. So he didn't know what was being published, which he has taken responsibility for.
Yet I cannot help but think you would be one that try to tie rev Wright's words to Obama even though Obama wasn't at many of the sermons. Paul's name wad on all the newsletters.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He didn't write it, so why should he take responsibility for the views written? He HAS taken responsibility for letting them get published.
