Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Who has done more to harm the working class?
The teabagger loons 43 47.78%
The Occupy loons 47 52.22%
Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2012, 05:49 PM
 
4,278 posts, read 5,177,911 times
Reputation: 2375

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by city414 View Post
the teaflaggers on th other hand didnt take their protest directly to the point of emphasis

you can bet your bottom dollar that if the teaflaggers protested on wall street there would be chaos...

there has been other occupy rallys with no incident, and how do we know those idiots arent republican plants? i man at tea party rallys there are those trying to say democrats planting plants with stupid signs.


GTFOH
I did not see any TEA (Taxed Enough Already) members getting arrested, taking a dump on police cars, attacking the police, camping out like a bunch of deadbeats. Those TEA (Taxed Enough Already) work and don't sit around waiting for something to give them a job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2012, 05:54 PM
 
4,278 posts, read 5,177,911 times
Reputation: 2375
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostLittleLibby View Post
What I think is strange is the tea party hatred of unions. Because if you asked any of these folks when the best time in modern history was, many of them would say the period after WWII when families could support themselves on one income, communities were strong, etc - but this was the greatest period of growth for unions, and most working-class men were in them. Which is WHY this period was so great for the average American. Right now less then EIGHT PERCENT of Americans are in unions - so how can pathetic wages be the fault of unions? I mean, 92% of the economy is NOT unionized. And what a coincidence - stagnating or falling wages are perfectly aligned with the disappearance of unions and collective bargaining (and the flight of decent jobs to the third world that the loss of unions permitted).

American workers should not have to compete with people who are chained to sewing machines and forced to work till they faint. Nor should they compete with the smog in China that is so bad, a huge growth industry is the sale of home air purification and indoor play areas because it isn't safe outdoors for children.

And for the record, I'm neither a teapartier NOR an occupier. I don't think either of these groups is addressing the real problem, which is that corporations have the legal right in this country to literally bribe our supposed "representatives" into voting against the basic interests of the average citizen. And until you change that and have full public funding of elections, you won't get real representation in government.
TEA Party people don't hate unions, but they do object to overpaid pubic sector union members robbing the tax payers. The economic boom after WW II was created by the private sector being unleashed and making products that sold here and around the world. The unions became their own worst enemy and ignored the growning demand for cheaper and better made products which were coming from countries like Japan. Today, the majority of Americans don't want to join a union. Especially, after those union people in WI last year displayed truely disgusting behavior. The gov. of WI has turned around the financial problems of that state and created a surplus. Where are those union people now? Demanding a recall so they can get back in power to steal from the taxpayers once again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 05:54 PM
 
7,006 posts, read 6,994,198 times
Reputation: 7060
Definitely the Occupiers, those spoiled white brats born of rich white liberals who've never held down a job in their lives, demanding money for nothing and defecating on police cars.

The Tea Party is full of intelligent middle-class taxpayers who are sick of the government bailing out Big Banks at the expense of the middle-class. They're not demanding anything other than corporate and government accountability and unlike the scatalogical Occupiers they don't begrudge people who work hard for their money, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Cape Coral
5,503 posts, read 7,332,984 times
Reputation: 2250
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFix View Post
Teabaggers in Congress want to raise taxes on the middle class, so they can give more tax breaks for their millionaire benefactors (who, of course, more than likely inherited all their wealth).

Meanwhile, the dreadlocked Occupy loons attempt to disrupt ports and prevent people from going to work. These shrill, bug-eyed loons actually think they're protesting the 1%, but in reality they hurt "truckdriver Joe" and "admin assistant Nancy" who is simply trying to get to work, and who rely on trade and commerce for a paycheck.

Also, some of the largest OWS donors are actually Mitt "Flip Flop" Romney supporters:

Romney Backer Is Biggest Occupy Wall Street Donor - His giving is 'a little ADD,' Robert Halper admits

So who is more anti-working class? The teabagger loons or the OWS loons?
You are despicible to call the Tea Party by some gay sex act name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 09:31 PM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,004 posts, read 12,592,213 times
Reputation: 8923
Tea Party. Not that many OWS have a strange idea of locations for protesting and an overly broad range of causes to protest.

>They live off of social security and other government handouts, all the while complaining about other bums living on the same welfare, and supporting their candidates that want to destroy that very hand that feeds them. <

You forgot old people on Medicare sitting on a government provided scooter protesting Obamacare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 09:38 PM
 
4,042 posts, read 3,528,918 times
Reputation: 1968
I am not aware that EITHER of them are anti-working class.
This poll assumes they are. Hmmm.....no way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 09:48 PM
 
Location: mancos
7,787 posts, read 8,028,546 times
Reputation: 6686
Get a job,shut up and stop blaming others for your sorry situation. It aint ever gonna be the 50's or 60's again.a college education aint worth nothing anymore.learn to live on the earth or die. our politicians and corporations sold us out for money.it is over kids good luck
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 12:34 AM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,811,333 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by totsuka View Post
I did not see any TEA (Taxed Enough Already) members getting arrested, taking a dump on police cars, attacking the police, camping out like a bunch of deadbeats.
The TEA (Totalitarian Evangelical Army) get arrested all the time for assaulting people, spitting in the faces of signature collectors, parading around with assault rifles, carrying hate filled, misspelled signs, members plotting terror attacks against america, etc,..

Quote:
Originally Posted by totsuka View Post
Those TEA (Taxed Enough Already) work and don't sit around waiting for something to give them a job.
Those TEA (The Elderly Astroturfers) work involves sitting around all day, watching fox, complaining about "da libruuls" on political sites, while collecting government handouts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 01:06 AM
 
4,127 posts, read 5,067,345 times
Reputation: 1621
Neither are relevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,201,401 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by rikoshaprl View Post
You are despicible to call the Tea Party by some gay sex act name.
Their problem they shouldn't have picked a nickname that involved a gay sex act, just as Santorum shouldn't have pick a name that described the by product of a gay sex act.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top