Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: The middle class is suffering and Republicans want to cut taxes for the wealthy. Do you agree with t
Yes, the wealthy need more money and power. This will help America. 38 20.54%
No, the Republicans are dead wrong.This hasn't ever helped anyone but the wealthy and will continue to hurt the middle class. 147 79.46%
Voters: 185. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-17-2012, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Brawndo-Thirst-Mutilator-Nation
22,581 posts, read 24,392,889 times
Reputation: 20222

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Well, you are entitled to believe what you want, even if that belief is false. The fact is that the government programs conservative deride are successful.




But getting back to the thread topic, "The middle class is suffering and the Republicans want to cut taxes for the wealthy," this fact is self-evident from this chart:



Apologists for rising inequality often argue that since most Americans’ income has risen despite rising inequality, there’s no reason to complain about inequality other than envy. But here we clearly see that GDP per capital (average) is rising but median family income is not rising, which indicates that high gains are concentrated in the top brackets. Thus, the middle class is suffering and the Republicans want to cut taxes for the wealthy.

Yeah right.

Take away all of the government cheese and see how many people fall into poverty. See, these programs are not a hand up.......but..........a permanent hand out that we cannot afford.

For example.....Baby Momma Bennies encourage women with no means to support a baby.....to get pregger.......so they can get on the Baby Momma Bennie gravy-train.

 
Old 01-17-2012, 05:02 PM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,183,299 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
Yeah right.

Take away all of the government cheese and see how many people fall into poverty. See, these programs are not a hand up.......but..........a permanent hand out that we cannot afford.

For example.....Baby Momma Bennies encourage women with no means to support a baby.....to get pregger.......so they can get on the Baby Momma Bennie gravy-train.
Shhhh... You might tick off the wingnuts that take much of that aid. Are you aware that red states take while blue states pay.
 
Old 01-17-2012, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Florida -
10,213 posts, read 14,753,640 times
Reputation: 21845
Default Class warfare thread doesn't really address the problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
More accurately, conservatives reject the notion that liberals always try to put forth - that the rich don't pay their "fair share" and/or that the rich pay less tax than everyone else. Both are patently false. The rich pay a SIGNIFICANTLY larger percentage than anyone else.
Additionally, they reject the notion that our economic problems would all be solved if the government simply had more taxes to spend. The real problem people have with raising taxes on the wealthy ... or anyone else -- is that our government has shown absolutely no ability or penchant towards reducing spending or spending more wisely! --

Funneling more taxes into a government that 'wastes money like a drunken sailor' is what people are upset about. (Apologies to any 'drunken sailors' out there --- At least you will only spend the money you have ... and will 'wake up' in the morning).
 
Old 01-17-2012, 05:45 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,884,748 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
Take away all of the government cheese and see how many people fall into poverty. See, these programs are not a hand up.......but..........a permanent hand out that we cannot afford.

For example.....Baby Momma Bennies encourage women with no means to support a baby.....to get pregger.......so they can get on the Baby Momma Bennie gravy-train.
Ad you know this because there were fewer poor people before the government, right?

What conservatives choose to believe is that government intervention caused problems, while in fact, government intervention was a reaction to problems and market failures. Nobody woke up on day and said, "I feel like regulating something." Regulation was a reaction.

On poverty, poverty was far higher before programs existed to relieve poverty.
 
Old 01-17-2012, 07:25 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,380,733 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzards27 View Post
I assume you discovered the error in your ways. It is easy to claim the uber wealthy pay a greater share of the federal income taxes when they are taking a much larger share of the income pie.

Overall federal income tax revenue has been flat, adjusted for inflation and gdp growth revenue has shrunk.
I sure read that one wrong. I must be getting old.
 
Old 01-17-2012, 07:40 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,380,733 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzards27 View Post
Shhhh... You might tick off the wingnuts that take much of that aid. Are you aware that red states take while blue states pay.
I'm from a blue state and here is a fact for you. Out of almost 40 million people, 400,000 tax returns fund half of California. How do you like them red apples?
 
Old 01-17-2012, 10:45 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,169,407 times
Reputation: 27718
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
No, but in the past when upper-income taxes were higher, the federal government cut checks to the states (e.g. revenue sharing.) This benefited citizens of the states -- especially poor states, like Mississippi, that now had money for its underfunded education system.

With more money to the states, the states were able to generously subsidize higher education. In NY, the state used to absorb 75% of higher ed costs. Now, it's 25%. That means that many can't afford college and hurts our society.

The federal government also was more able to invest in America's infrastructure that increased productivity for everyone. That's just not happening now due to concern over spending.
Well that won't happen because right now the Treasury is borrowing from Federal pensions to pay bills. Even if you increased taxes the Fed still spends too much.
 
Old 01-18-2012, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,884,748 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Well that won't happen because right now the Treasury is borrowing from Federal pensions to pay bills. Even if you increased taxes the Fed still spends too much.
That's precisely the symptom of too low taxes and why they should be raised at least back to the rates during the Clinton glory days.
 
Old 01-18-2012, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,169,407 times
Reputation: 27718
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
That's precisely the symptom of too low taxes and why they should be raised at least back to the rates during the Clinton glory days.
Then why is the USG and local government CUTTING taxes ?
Why did the Bush cuts not expire and turn into the Obama cuts ?
Why did they allow the payroll tax cut and then EXTEND it ?
Why did Obama just offer tax incentives (cuts) to corporations for workers when those corporations were coming back to the US anyway ?

The USG is not for raising taxes nor are they for cutting spending.
They are doing just the opposite..cutting taxes and raising spending.
 
Old 01-18-2012, 09:36 AM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,221 posts, read 12,270,838 times
Reputation: 3554
I got it! The feds spend too much on helping to the less fortunate, which has seem to grow because there are limited amount of jobs. The wealthy are paying less taxes on their capital gains than people who actually work. Republicans can't see this and the democrats can't explain it
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top