Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-22-2012, 12:58 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,266,469 times
Reputation: 1837

Advertisements

Yes, more out of context quote mines, and an footage ripped from Loose Change, where even the creators have been ostracized by the "leaders" of the truth movement.

No, the video doesn't provide proof of anything. It proves that you are gullible to believe the lies of con artists however.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-22-2012, 01:00 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,266,469 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911FireAndRescue View Post
As a matter of FACT, the entire video supports my claim....denier.
Actually, it doesn't. all it shows is those who were there were speculating on what happened based on what they knew at the time.

You prove yet again, you do not know what a SIMILE is. A fundamental concept of the English language taught at the 1st grade level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 01:01 PM
 
60 posts, read 42,572 times
Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
They ignore physics.
You ignore physics.

Otherwise you would know that it is mathematically impossible for those 3 buildings to fall as quickly and completely as they did that day without using controlled demolition. And that is a FACT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 01:02 PM
 
60 posts, read 42,572 times
Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
Actually, it doesn't.
You're wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 01:08 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,266,469 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911FireAndRescue View Post
You ignore physics.
No I haven't. I have the three NIST reports to back up that what happened on 9/11 was possible.

Quote:
Otherwise you would know that it is mathematically impossible for those 3 buildings to fall as quickly and completely as they did that day without using controlled demolition. And that is a FACT.
No it is not a fact. This proves that you know nothing of what you speak and have never read the reports. They are written so that a layman can understand, and provide the calculations that prove what happened that day is completely possible.


WTC 1 and WTC 2 took nearly 16 seconds and 24 seconds to completely collapse. That is in no way possible with controlled demolition.

Please provide us wit the proof of the thousands of successive explosions that would be needed to do a controlled demolition


These are controlled demolitions:

Landmark Implosion - YouTube


Las Gladiolas Housing Complex - Controlled Demolition, Inc. - YouTube


MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Main Building - Controlled Demolition, Inc. - YouTube


J.L. Hudsons Department Store - GUINNESS WORLD RECORD!! - Controlled Demolition, Inc. - YouTube



This did not happen on 9/11
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 01:17 PM
 
60 posts, read 42,572 times
Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
This did not happen on 9/11
This is exactly what happened on 9/11. Thank you for proving me correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 01:22 PM
 
60 posts, read 42,572 times
Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
WTC 1 and WTC 2 took nearly 16 seconds and 24 seconds to completely collapse. That is in no way possible with controlled demolition.
Wrong...again.

On page 305 of the 9/11 Commission Report, we are told, in the government's "complete and final report" of 9/11, that the South Tower "collapsed" in 10 seconds. Here is the exact quote: "At 9:58:59, the South Tower collapsed in ten seconds". That's the government's official number.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 01:25 PM
 
60 posts, read 42,572 times
Reputation: 13
Btw, 10 seconds is very close to free fall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 01:27 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,266,469 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911FireAndRescue View Post
This is exactly what happened on 9/11.
No, this is not what happened Please provide the "video" (since you love videos so much) of the thousands of explosive charges going off prior to each collapse of the buildings.

Seems that you missed this key point in the term Controlled Demoltion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 01:28 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,266,469 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911FireAndRescue View Post
Btw, 10 seconds is very close to free fall.
You're nothing but a copy and pasta salad of long debunked truther claims.

Please provide your calculations for this conclusion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top