Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-07-2012, 05:54 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585

Advertisements

The Federal Deficit is getting smaller under Obama.

Yearly deficit falls below $1 trillion for the first time under Obama - The Hill's On The Money
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-07-2012, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonian123 View Post
Obama created 1.9 million total private sector non-farm jobs in 2011.

December employment report: 200K new jobs, 8.5% unemployment - CBS News

He also eliminated over 589,000 government jobs since 2008.

CARPE DIEM: Chart of the Day: Historic Drop in Government Jobs

He is the best conservative President we have ever had.
It is funny how people scream about uncontrolled government expansion, when the exact opposite is true. Not to worry, mitt Romney will expand it back to it's size when he is elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 07:11 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
FAIL. Obama opposed those cuts mentioned

What spending bills has Obama veto'd? Another example of liberals taking credit for CONGRESS on behlaf of Obama
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 07:13 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
It is funny how people scream about uncontrolled government expansion, when the exact opposite is true. Not to worry, mitt Romney will expand it back to it's size when he is elected.
The federal government is expanding, they are simply subcontracting out services now

Guy two doors up from me has worked for the patent office for 20 years, just this year he became a private contractor and was able to move to Ohio. This doesnt mean the federal government got smaller
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
The federal government is expanding, they are simply subcontracting out services now

Guy two doors up from me has worked for the patent office for 20 years, just this year he became a private contractor and was able to move to Ohio. This doesnt mean the federal government got smaller
In other words they privatized the services How dare they. I guess you just have something against everything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 07:26 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
In other words they privatized the services How dare they. I guess you just have something against everything.
We arent discussing if its good or bad, we are discussing you saying the government was shrinking.

You were wrong

Where did I object to privatizing? Why do you lie so much?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
We arent discussing if its good or bad, we are discussing you saying the government was shrinking.

You were wrong

Where did I object to privatizing? Why do you lie so much?
It shrank by 600 000 employees. They used to be government empoyees with government retirement plans, health insurances etc, and now they work for the private sector. They get paid only when their services are needed, as opposed to permanent salaries. The size of the government shrank, period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:07 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
It shrank by 600 000 employees. They used to be government empoyees with government retirement plans, health insurances etc, and now they work for the private sector.
The government is stll paying them
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
They get paid only when their services are needed, as opposed to permanent salaries. The size of the government shrank, period.
The patent office has something like a 5 year backlog, they are still receiving salaries and federal spending has DOUBLED over the last 10 years

New liberal math, double federal spending and then proclaim you shrank government.. haha
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by gysmo View Post
three years and still not under 8% what a failure! after borrowing 1 trillion dollars and spending it to save the economy and all Obama has accomplish is 0.5% point drop in unemployment. in three years, we cant fired this man soon enough!! no spinning necessary. the man is a total failure!!
Then you must have concluded Reagan a failure too:



Let's not forget that Reagan started with a 7.5% unemployment rate and it went up to 10.8% before starting down. Now, with 10 months before the election, Obama's unemployment is around where Reagan's was too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
If government is getting smaller, why has the national debt increased?
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
We've been though this before. The economic downturn caused lower tax revenue. It also caused an increase in unemployment insurance and other safety net programs. While conservatives frame the issue as Obama increasing the size of government, the deficit reflects the government we had responding to a terrible economy.

It's a good thing we have these programs or there would be rioting in the streets.

But the major disconnect is that the conservatives say that the government shouldn't be involved in the economy then blame Obama for not bring down private unemployment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:41 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Then you must have concluded Reagan a failure too:
There are many people who believed Reagan to be a failure at this period in his term
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
We've been though this before. The economic downturn caused lower tax revenue. It also caused an increase in unemployment insurance and other safety net programs. While conservatives frame the issue as Obama increasing the size of government, the deficit reflects the government we had responding to a terrible economy.
You understand this much, but then you go on and on supporting policies which continue to lower the GDP and prolonging the recession. Thats really odd unless you hate america and like to see people suffer.

Furthermore, thats only part of the problem, dont begin to think government hasnt increased in size, that argument would foolish. This is obamacare for example.

And here is the rest of the industry which came as a result.

You somehow think government SHRANK.. laughable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
It's a good thing we have these programs or there would be rioting in the streets.
Wow, what a low opinion you have of your fellow human beings. I suppose you can point out some examples of this being true. Not even during the great depression that took place, and we were no where close to that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
But the major disconnect is that the conservatives say that the government shouldn't be involved in the economy then blame Obama for not bring down private unemployment.
Actually the disconnect is YOU, who somehow thinks that taking money out of the economy will cause people to spend more. Its YOU by thinking that government growing in size, and then contracting services out, is government shrinking. Its YOU guys who run around demanding more and more governmental services, demanding more governmental interferance, more laws, more regulations, and then a month later, you try to say LESS came as a result. YOU complain about bailouts and then you want more of them. Fannie/Freddie, unemployment, welfare, and more. You liberals are a walking contradiction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top