Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-10-2012, 07:59 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,049,136 times
Reputation: 10270

Advertisements

Any at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-10-2012, 09:36 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954
I'm not and never have been a Democrat... but here:

Quote:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2012, 09:57 PM
 
4,911 posts, read 3,429,454 times
Reputation: 1257
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
Any at all.
Remember that great idea the Republicans had of citing the Constitution for every bill? That kinda didn't last too long did it? Gee I wonder why

I'd like to know where in the Constitution it states that In God We Trust is to be our national motto, or even that we should have a national motto at all. Where in the Constitution does it state that if you don't wear a flag pin then you hate America? Where in the Constitution does it say it's ok for Congress to add words to another guy's work?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2012, 10:09 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,391,755 times
Reputation: 3086
Article 1. Section 8. Clause 1.

"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States;"

The way I view this is that congress may use their discretion to pass legislation to improve the well being of the American people, e.g. social security.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2012, 10:20 PM
 
2,168 posts, read 3,386,523 times
Reputation: 2653
I lean Democratic, but I am a registered Independent.

The Constitution set the framework for the authority of different levels of government and the balance of powers between different branches of government.

The Founding Fathers, realizing the need for adaptability and flexibility, created the Amending clause to allow amendments (most notably the Bill of Rights) to the Constitution. The Amending clause was added to the Constitution after lessons were learned from the failure of the Articles of Confederation to create a functional federal government.

The Constitution has a long, rich history of interpretation. This power of interpretation is granted to the Supreme Court. There are plenty of milestone cases that have been determined to be Constitutional by the Supreme Court. Rather than list then all here, follow the link: Milestone Cases in Supreme Court History — Infoplease.com

One major talking point of Ron Paul and his supporters is the Constitutionality of the Federal Reserve. However, neither Ron Paul nor his supporters want to acknowledge the Supreme Court decision of McColloch vs. Maryland which set the precedent in 1819 for a central bank.

We are a system of three equal branches of government where Congress has the authority to propose amendments to the Constitution, and the Supreme Court has the authority to determine the Constitutionality of matters. Ron Paul's worldview was formed by Ayn Rand and Austrian economists. That is merely one individual's point of view among a sea of opinions. It can be reinforced, debated, or debunked depending on the societal values at the time of interpretation. This is why the Founding Fathers did not leave interpretation of the Constitution up to a single individual.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2012, 11:54 PM
 
Location: Holiday, FL
1,571 posts, read 2,000,704 times
Reputation: 1165
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv View Post
Remember that great idea the Republicans had of citing the Constitution for every bill? That kinda didn't last too long did it? Gee I wonder why

I'd like to know where in the Constitution it states that In God We Trust is to be our national motto, or even that we should have a national motto at all. Where in the Constitution does it state that if you don't wear a flag pin then you hate America? Where in the Constitution does it say it's ok for Congress to add words to another guy's work?
Would you like to listen to a response from the Democrats?????


Democratic Congressman "I don't care about the Constitution!" - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2012, 11:58 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,386,012 times
Reputation: 8672
The constitutional argument, and the successful ones before the supreme court mind you, are based on the idea that the constitution is a living document, and open to interpretation.

The "general welfare" clause is generally used to justify social programs like welfare, social security, medicare, etc.

The federal government, through judicial precedent since the 1800's, has interpreted that the federal government can levy taxes and create programs that benefit the general welfare.

That is your constitutional argument.

Now, you sound like a strict constructionalist. You want to follow the constitution to the letter.

I will make you a bet, I will name one government program or law that is unconstitutional under a strict constructional view that you agree with and like, I guarantee you I can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2012, 01:53 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
9,855 posts, read 11,930,564 times
Reputation: 10028
From my time here on City Data I have learned that Conservatives would: Shut down the EPA. Repeal minimum wage statutes. Abolish taxation. Abolish unions. Use the Federal Government for defense only. America sits between two big ass oceans with a friendly country to the north and a Third World country to the south. I'm not sure why we need a half-trillion a year defense budget but that's not my main point. My main point is that the country is not being run by City Data wingnuts. Thank God. I'm not sure how long the country would last if being run by the likes of the o.p. but it would probably be a decade or less. Liberal policies are neccessary to keep the country from dissolving into anarchy. Don't believe me? Tough. You should. History is full of the lessons of the results of piling insult upon injury of large numbers of citizenry. Why spend so much money to secure the country from threats from without only to have it rot through from within? Does that make sense? Spending 12 Trillion dollars on two wars while middle class Americans were forced into tent cities is going to come back to haunt someone. I really have my doubts as to whether anything we do now matters. Some mistakes are just too big to recover from.

H
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2012, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,111,909 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
Any at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
I'm not and never have been a Democrat... but here:

Quote:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Check and mate...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2012, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,897,466 times
Reputation: 4512
To promote the general welfare, I have decided to totally outlaw abortion. See what I did there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top