Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What a truly messed up country that this nutjob judge could do this to a sitting POTUS.
The North should never have withdrawn its troops. Obviously, the job wasn't finished [/quote]What a idiotic thing say. State your case why you are against this.
The law does not apply to Obama, just ask him. The dictator-in-training has disregarded the orders of higher courts than this.
I honestly don't care if people like what you stated or not, could care less. Fact is it is true! Obama from day one, felt as if he had the media on his side at all times. Felt as if he could disregard the orders of the higher court, because he is Obama.
Wrong feel that some people by now, are tired of this nonesense. And feel that the dictator, just needs to go and dictate to his family.
Fact is it is true! Obama from day one, felt as if he had the media on his side at all times. Felt as if he could disregard the orders of the higher court, because he is Obama.
Wrong feel that some people by now, are tired of this nonesense. And feel that the dictator, just needs to go and dictate to his family.
Which "orders of the higher court" has Obama disregarded, and how do you know what he felt?
You use the word "fact" in a manner inconsistent with its meaning.
this is not a legal subpoena. it was not directly issued from the judge and the things it requests can not be granted from such a subpoena. these are pre-signed documents that are available to attorneys with cases in the judge's court. the assumption is that a competent attorney will know what can be requested on a subpoena......... obviously they never expected orly taitz.
this is not a legal subpoena. it was not directly issued from the judge and the things it requests can not be granted from such a subpoena. these are pre-signed documents that are available to attorneys with cases in the judge's court. the assumption is that a competent attorney will know what can be requested on a subpoena......... obviously they never expected orly taitz.
If you read the rules in Georgia the administrative agency issues subpoenas, signed by the judge but otherwise blank, to the lawyers in the case. The lawyers fill them in and serve them. The judge doesn't look at the subpoena until someone either challenges it or the issuing party complains that it wasn't obeyed. Those subpoenas with Judge Malihi's name that are downloadable are legal. We have those type subpoenas at the courthouse where I live. Also Taitz is not the only attorney. You haven't mentioned the others challenging Obama. Why?
Actually, this thread is a great idea....it keeps all of the "BIRFER" nuts corralled into the same spot so that they aren't popping into other threads with this stupidity.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
[/quote]
