Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-20-2012, 12:17 PM
 
2,095 posts, read 2,582,915 times
Reputation: 1268

Advertisements

According to the official BLS numbers, the private sector has created more jobs in Obama's first term then Bush's.

Can someone explain their reasoning to me?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-20-2012, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,833,891 times
Reputation: 12341
The reasoning is same as calling him: Muslim, Pinko, Commie, Socialist, Fascist, Nazi, America-hater, Kenyan...

In other words, no reasoning at all, pure politics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2012, 12:22 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,211,396 times
Reputation: 5481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonian123 View Post
According to the official BLS numbers, the private sector has created more jobs in Obama's first term then Bush's.

Can someone explain their reasoning to me?
It is funny that you think either president has any meaningful affect whatsoever on how many jobs were created in the private sector.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2012, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,833,891 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
It is funny that you think either president has any meaningful affect whatsoever on how many jobs were created in the private sector.
It is funny that you're not questioning those who call him job-killer. Or, as usual, only a one-sided rule applies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2012, 12:24 PM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,734,634 times
Reputation: 6407
Bush was starting from FULL EMPLOYMENT. No much need for new jobs in a booming economy.

Barry got to start after the reset button was pushed when the Democrats took over the Congress and the economy nosedived.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2012, 12:24 PM
 
Location: United State of Texas
1,707 posts, read 6,212,704 times
Reputation: 2135
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
It is funny that you think either president has any meaningful affect whatsoever on how many jobs were created in the private sector.
^^^ Truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2012, 12:27 PM
 
1,482 posts, read 2,385,734 times
Reputation: 943
Why do Republicans keep calling Obama a job killer?

Probably because they can't call him by that name they really want to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2012, 12:31 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,062,846 times
Reputation: 10270
You're all right.

He's doing a heck of a job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2012, 12:35 PM
 
1,027 posts, read 1,257,449 times
Reputation: 892
For the same reason they claim he was a Kenyan with a fake birth certificate, or that Osama Bin Laden is still alive and his death was faked.

Being a Republican might very well be a clinical mental disorder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2012, 12:36 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,833,891 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
Bush was starting from FULL EMPLOYMENT. No much need for new jobs in a booming economy.
1- Define "full employment".
2- Reality check: This nation saw 2.9 million jobs dropped out of private sector in first three years after Bush took office.

Jan 2001-Dec 2003: -2.9 million jobs
Jan 2004-Dec 2006: +6.0 million jobs
Jan 2007-Dec 2008: -3.8 million jobs

Net private sector job growth in eight years (ignoring the continued drop in 2009): -0.7 million.
Net civilian labor force growth in eight years: +10.3 million jobs.

That is not how "full employment" is supposed to look. For that, look at the mid-late 90s (beginning sometime in 1993).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top