Should prostitution be legalized? Why or why not? (Putin, Iraq, border)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, I certainly don't buy that "school of thought". Maybe sexual pleasure which can be taken care of by masturbating, but not sex with another person, no.
Another person's necessary for said need to be fulfilled.
Quote:
But prostitution can result in complications as well. One or the other can still catch feelings, particularly if they don't just robotically go in, do their business, then leave. As for the threat of a *dum dum dum* relationship, a man who can't find a "friend with benefits" or an "open relationship" is still a man who has to pay for sex. And this type of man shouldn't be getting any... Sex, that is.
Said man will often enter into a conventional relationship but not honor any bonds of committment.
I think you feel that men should be denied sex across the board.
Absolutely. It is not a valid role of government to tell people what they can do with their bodies and who they can have sex with and what arrangement they can make to have sex.
I'm fine with cracking down on human trafficking for both the sex trade and the fast food trade, and legalizing prostitution (and drugs) in the process. The number of illegals then would be quite small.
Human trafficking is illegal and government should protect people from trafficking. Trafficking has nothing to do with legalizing prostitution.
Sure, legalize it, whatever. But I think it's a bad idea. The type of man who has to pay for sex shouldn't be getting any; and the type of woman who rewards that type of man, causing further deterioration of his social skills and thus society in general, shouldn't be getting money to do so. Lazy, meet lazy. Now, be enablers for eachother
You have no idea what you are talking about. Millions of men who don't "Have to pay for sex" use prostitutes. And they aren't lazy.
Traditionalist Catholics would be against any sexual sins.
Whether or not catholics are against sexual sins is irrelevant on a question of law. We do not legislate based upon religious rules, indeed it is prohibited.
To the OP... Absolutely, prostitution should be legalized. Any thing that is legal when free should be legal when not.
Another person's necessary for said need to be fulfilled.
For the need of sexual pleasure to be fulfilled, another person is necessary? *buzzer*
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun
Said man will often enter into a conventional relationship but not honor any bonds of committment.
Not without developing some social skills, he won't
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun
I think you feel that men should be denied sex across the board.
Ah yes, the extreme accusations of those who disagree with you being extremist. I figured it was just a matter of time...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003
You have no idea what you are talking about. Millions of men who don't "Have to pay for sex" use prostitutes. And they aren't lazy.
You might be quite surprised.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Millions of men who DO have to pay for sex use prostitutes. Hence, the reason they are paying for sex instead of getting it for free. They ARE lazy, as are the prostitutes rewarding them. You might be quite surprised.
I believe I said a man like that shouldn't be getting sex at all, not until he grows up. His physical is developed, but not his mental, as evidenced by his lack of social skill
Hey, not all of us guys are hot looking studs when we grow up!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.