Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:29 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,825,654 times
Reputation: 699

Advertisements

Hatfield filed contempt charges....will post excerpts..and a link

Last edited by DraggingCanoe; 02-01-2012 at 10:39 PM..

 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:30 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,825,654 times
Reputation: 699
Citation For Contempt (Hatfield)

Now come Plaintiffs Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, by and through undersigned counsel, and move the Court, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-13-13(b) and OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.22 (5), to certify to the Superior Court of Fulton County certain facts, relative to the contemptuous behavior of the Defendant before this Court, for a determination of appropriate action, including a finding of contempt, In support of this Citation For Contempt, Plaintiffs show to the Court the following facts-:

1. On or about January 19, 2012, undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs served upon defense counsel a "Notice to Produce," requiring Defendant Barack Obama to appear at the January 26, 2012 trial of this matter and to bring with him into Court certain documents and other items to be used as evidence by the Plaintiffs at trial,

2. Defense counsel made no response to Plaintiffs' Notice to Produce-. Defense counsel filed no motion for protective order, motion to quash the Notice to Produce, or any other pleading objecting to the Notice to Produce,

3. Despite being timely served with the aforesaid Notice to Produce, Defendant Obama failed to appear for the trial of these matters on January 26, 2012. Likewise, Defendant's attorney also failed to appear for trial- None of the documents or other evidence sought by Plaintiffs was produced as required by Plaintiffs' Notice to Produce.

4. The failure of Defendant Obama (and defense counsel) to appear for trial on January 26, 2012 was knowing, intentional, and deliberate, as demonstrated by Plaintiffs' Exhibit 12, a January 25, 2012 letter written by defense counsel to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp.

5. Defendant Obama's behavior in failing to comply with Plaintiffs' Notice to. Produce, by appearing for trial with the requested documentary and other evidence demonstrates Defendant's contempt for this Court and for the judiciary generally- OSAB _Rule 616-1-2-,22 (5) provides, in pertinent part, that the Administrative Law Judge, upon application of a party, shall certify the facts to the superior court the county in which a party, agent, or employee of a party: disobeys or resists any lawful order or process; neglects to produce, after having been ordered to do so, any pertinent book, paper, or document; or refuses to appear after having been subpoenaed, for a determination of the appropriate action, including a finding of contempt.

7. Plaintiffs hereby request that this Court certify the foregoing facts to the Superior Court of Fulton County for a determination of the appropriate action to be taken with regard to Defendant's contemptuous conduct.

Continued including two more filings:

Georgia Ballot Challenge News | Article II Super PAC

Last edited by DraggingCanoe; 02-01-2012 at 10:39 PM..
 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:41 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,825,654 times
Reputation: 699
5. Defendant Obama's behavior in failing to comply with Plaintiffs' Notice to Produce, by appearing for trial with the requested documentary and other evidence demonstrates Defendant's contempt for this Court... neglects to produce, after having been ordered to do so, any pertinent book, paper, or document; or refuses to appear after having been subpoenaed, for a determination of the appropriate action, including a finding of contempt."

Great stuff.
 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:47 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,825,654 times
Reputation: 699
Plaintiffs' Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Hatfield)



http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFile...ge2-1-2012.pdf
 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:53 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,825,654 times
Reputation: 699

Carl Swensson Interview Atlanta, GA 1/26/2012 - YouTube!
 
Old 02-02-2012, 01:10 AM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,270,334 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
case filed in Maryland....

By a known birther kook who makes stupid youtube videos that showcases all of her racist rants.
 
Old 02-02-2012, 01:11 AM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,270,334 times
Reputation: 1837
Jablonski files a Brief: Re-Allocation of Burden of Proof

http://www.scribd.com/doc/79683428/2...urden-of-Proof

Correctly cites that birthers have provided nothing that challenges Obama's citizenship.

Finally, Jablonski does something right.
 
Old 02-02-2012, 05:55 AM
 
1,777 posts, read 1,402,771 times
Reputation: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
Jablonski files a Brief: Re-Allocation of Burden of Proof

2012-01-23 OBAMA Brief Re Allocation of Burden of Proof

Correctly cites that birthers have provided nothing that challenges Obama's citizenship.

Finally, Jablonski does something right.
Looks like that was filed on the 23rd. Did he send in any proposed findings of fact and law?

If not, poor old Malihi is going to have to do a lot of work on his own because what the other parties sent him are completely useless.
 
Old 02-02-2012, 05:56 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,937,590 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
Jablonski files a Brief: Re-Allocation of Burden of Proof

2012-01-23 OBAMA Brief Re Allocation of Burden of Proof

Correctly cites that birthers have provided nothing that challenges Obama's citizenship.

Finally, Jablonski does something right.
Seems he might be a bit late.

Quote:
Plaintiffs are not required "to disprove anything regarding [Defendant Obama's] eligibility to run for office...."
The burden is entirely on obama to PROVE he is eligible.

Quote:
9. Applying the aforesaid rule of Minor v. Happersett in the instant cases, the Court concludes that Defendant Obama does
not meet the Article II "natural born Citizen" requirement for the presidency, as Defendant Obama's father was not a United
States citizen at the time of Defendant's birth.
Quote:
For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes and hereby reports to the Secretary of State that Plaintiffs' challenges to
the qualifications of Defendant Barack Obama should be sustained and upheld
Cool.
 
Old 02-02-2012, 06:02 AM
 
26,563 posts, read 14,439,886 times
Reputation: 7431
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Seems he might be a bit late.
it was filed on january 23.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top