Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Unfunded tax cuts, Reagan did it, and it resulted in a deficit, GWB did it, and it resulted in a deficit, now the GOP dopefuls are preaching the same sermon, and, yes they will add to the deficit.
Isn't doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results the definition of insanity? If so, we have some lunatics running for President.
Here's a big hint, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out...if you cut revenue without cutting spending, a deficit will result.
Yes, I know this is an op-ed from HuffPo, but actually read it, and decide if you want the same old same old from these guys.
...The New York Times analyzed the tax plans put forward by Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum to determine how much each of them would add to the national deficit in a single year. Romney's would add $600 billion. Santorum was tied with Gingrich at $1.3 trillion, or more than twice as much.
Ron Paul wants to eliminate the income tax altogether, making the economic future under his Presidency as difficult to predict as the space-time continuum inside a black hole. That's probably why the Times didn't try. (It would be an interesting project, though.)
Unfunded tax cuts, Reagan did it, and it resulted in a deficit, GWB did it, and it resulted in a deficit, now the GOP dopefuls are preaching the same sermon, and, yes they will add to the deficit.
Isn't doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results the definition of insanity? If so, we have some lunatics running for President.
Here's a big hint, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out...if you cut revenue without cutting spending, a deficit will result.
Yes, I know this is an op-ed from HuffPo, but actually read it, and decide if you want the same old same old from these guys.
...The New York Times analyzed the tax plans put forward by Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum to determine how much each of them would add to the national deficit in a single year. Romney's would add $600 billion. Santorum was tied with Gingrich at $1.3 trillion, or more than twice as much.
Ron Paul wants to eliminate the income tax altogether, making the economic future under his Presidency as difficult to predict as the space-time continuum inside a black hole. That's probably why the Times didn't try. (It would be an interesting project, though.)
I haven't time at present to read the link, but the title of your thread is outstanding. Reminds me of Lovecraft.
Unfunded tax cuts, Reagan did it, and it resulted in a deficit, GWB did it, and it resulted in a deficit, now the GOP dopefuls are preaching the same sermon, and, yes they will add to the deficit.
Isn't doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results the definition of insanity? If so, we have some lunatics running for President.
Here's a big hint, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out...if you cut revenue without cutting spending, a deficit will result.
Yes, I know this is an op-ed from HuffPo, but actually read it, and decide if you want the same old same old from these guys.
...The New York Times analyzed the tax plans put forward by Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum to determine how much each of them would add to the national deficit in a single year. Romney's would add $600 billion. Santorum was tied with Gingrich at $1.3 trillion, or more than twice as much.
Ron Paul wants to eliminate the income tax altogether, making the economic future under his Presidency as difficult to predict as the space-time continuum inside a black hole. That's probably why the Times didn't try. (It would be an interesting project, though.)
................ and you are suggesting that Obama would be better regarding fiscal responsibility?
Obama is a proven failure
Romney balanced the budget in Massachusetts
Gingrich had the most fiscally responsible congress since ww2
................ and you are suggesting that Obama would be better regarding fiscal responsibility?
Obama is a proven failure
Romney balanced the budget in Massachusetts
Gingrich had the most fiscally responsible congress since ww2
Unfunded tax cuts will result in a deficit, what about that do you not get?
I am saying that these guys won't do any better in deficit cutting or job creation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
