Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,282,893 times
Reputation: 3826

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Leach.

$3.25/gallon, with $0.384/gallon in fed-state taxes, I paid 6.3% in taxes to federal government, and 7.1% to Texas when I filled up my car last week.
I still own land in Maryland, out by the W. Va border (MD's hindquarters). I have ties to the state and have hope that it will emerge out of its darkness. But their draconian gun laws, crime, traffic and cost of living exceed the highly interesting nature of the job offer in question. Plus, the pay is just insufficient especially when you add this on to my commuting bill. I'll stay here in less crowded, less crime, more diverse area of Raleigh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:20 PM
 
2,095 posts, read 2,581,533 times
Reputation: 1268
Yes. I think it should be more than 6%. Gas prices are too low in this country. Higher gas prices will force car manufacturers to make more efficient vehicles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:22 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,123,773 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonian123 View Post
Yes. I think it should be more than 6%. Gas prices are too low in this country. Higher gas prices will force car manufacturers to make more efficient vehicles.
So inflicting pain on citizens is the way to do that? It's not like efficient cars will show up tomorrow. How long are you willing to absorb higher gas prices before you get pisssed enough at automakers for being excrutiatingly slow at bringing more fuel efficiency to the market. Do you like being beholden to car companies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
So inflicting pain on citizens is the way to do that? It's not like efficient cars will show up tomorrow. How long are you willing to absorb higher gas prices before you get pisssed enough at automakers for being excrutiatingly slow at bringing more fuel efficiency to the market. Do you like being beholden to car companies?
If you think 6% would be inflicting pain, the way oil industry manages to fluctuate prices is downright murderous.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Irrelevant. And actually defeats your own argument. You did not pay a sales tax. But now you promote one. Tell us why.
I said, I paid 6.3% in taxes to federal government, and 7.1% in taxes to state (Texas) government. Just because it ain't called "sales tax" doesn't make it "not a tax". As for why I promote it? Americans need to get in touch with the realities. And to learn that if 6% bothers them so much, perhaps they can take a look at themselves and see if they can do something about it. I can. Can you not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:30 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post

Do you support a sales tax for gasoline in your state, on top of federal and state gasoline taxes that already exist?
Yes I do with the condition every penny they now collect and any increase would go exclusively to roads & bridges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Yes I do with the condition every penny they now collect and any increase would go exclusively to roads & bridges.
Why only roads and bridges? That sounds like a business proposition for oil companies, promoting more oil based infrastructure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:34 PM
 
2,095 posts, read 2,581,533 times
Reputation: 1268
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
So inflicting pain on citizens is the way to do that? It's not like efficient cars will show up tomorrow. How long are you willing to absorb higher gas prices before you get pisssed enough at automakers for being excrutiatingly slow at bringing more fuel efficiency to the market. Do you like being beholden to car companies?
Car companies will only respond to what consumers demand. Most Americans do not care about fuel economy. The only way to get your average American to care about fuel economy is if they see higher gas prices. I drive a lot so I would be paying alot more for gas but I am willing to take the short term pain for the long term benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:36 PM
 
Location: Syracuse, New York
3,121 posts, read 3,096,310 times
Reputation: 2312
It's a bit much to to charge a gas tax and sales tax on the same gallon of gas.

He should have the guts to propose a flat increase on gas. If he doesn't have the guts, he should drop the proposal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Montgomery County, MD
3,236 posts, read 3,938,592 times
Reputation: 3010
I'm actually from MD and we need that tax to support our infrastructure and build the Purple Line extension to the DC Metro rail. A lot of people on here have no idea what any of this is about so I'm not sure why you bother commenting. Congestion is horrible in the DC area and I applaud O'Malley for being forward thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:46 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,123,773 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhenomenalAJ View Post
I'm actually from MD and we need that tax to support our infrastructure and build the Purple Line extension to the DC Metro rail. A lot of people on here have no idea what any of this is about so I'm not sure why you bother commenting. Congestion is horrible in the DC area and I applaud O'Malley for being forward thinking.
Actually, funny you mention that. The whole reason that MD needs more tax revenue for infrastructure is because it failed to invest in its infrastructure during good times. Now it's behind the curve and asking citizens to make up for the failure of government. The Purple Line is a side show intended to make people like you stump for the Governor. It obviously worked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top