Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-04-2012, 04:44 PM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,951,133 times
Reputation: 2938

Advertisements

Where do people get the idea that high-speed rail is inherently a money loser? The evidence seems to show otherwise. If you want to get upset over government spending and waste, then you can scream against the interstate highway system, which cost taxpayers trillions of dollars but has never made a penny ever since it was built. Even the Amtrak Acela line, the fastest passenger train in the US is running at a profit. So much for the anti-rail propaganda. Let's look at the facts instead of relying on blind partisan ideology.

Of course, High speed rail will not work everywhere in the US. No one is proposing to build it on a national scale. That would be stupid. But in certain dense metropolitan regions that will attract high ridership levels, HSR makes a lot of sense.






California High Speed Rail Blog » Tell Steve Lopez: HSR Is No Boondoggle
February 2, 2012

....Many HSR critics and opponents are motivated by their belief that nobody will ride trains in California. Those arguments are completely baseless, fly in the face of the available evidence, and should simply not be taken seriously. Amtrak California is setting ridership records. Remember that the independent peer review found the HSR ridership numbers to be sound.

....In fact, it is NOT a “very big if” whether the train can support itself. It’s actually highly likely that it will be able to do so. It’s not like California is proposing to do something radical and untested. We’ve known for 50 years that high speed rail works. And it turns a profit – in Japan and France, Spain, Russia, Taiwan, even the Amtrak Acela. And California compares favorably to those globally successful routes. In most of these cases, riders have flocked to HSR from planes – including the Acela.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-04-2012, 04:51 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,192,216 times
Reputation: 7693
Over 100 Billion dollars plus (as it stands now) for high speed rail and the state is laying off teachers and closing all types of public assistance programs.

Makes perfect sense to me..

And what do they say about the first leg of this HSR?

Quote:
It would be a 130-mile line from just north of Fresno running south to Bakersfield in the Central Valley, one of the state's least populated areas, where bullet trains would run.
Bumpy ride for California's high-speed rail effort | Reuters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Montgomery County, MD
3,236 posts, read 3,937,236 times
Reputation: 3010
All the people opposing it are generally not bright and forward thinking enough to realize our population is going to increase and we need more and better transportation options. They're the same type of ignorant luddite that thought our Interstate Highway System would be an expensive boondoggle that would just be a massive money drain when it has in fact been one of the most important engines in American commerce.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 04:53 PM
 
3,709 posts, read 4,627,268 times
Reputation: 1671
The country is mainly interested in a high-speed rail from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. all the hell way back to Chicago.

To be completed before next January.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 04:54 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,192,216 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by cisco kid View Post
Where do people get the idea that high-speed rail is inherently a money loser?
Because this is America where the automobile rules the roost.

Spain, France, Taiwan and Japan, they'd all fit inside Texas.

Oh yeah, and HSR will only benefit the 1%...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,343,552 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by cisco kid View Post
Where do people get the idea that high-speed rail is inherently a money loser? The evidence seems to show otherwise. If you want to get upset over government spending and waste, then you can scream against the interstate highway system, which cost taxpayers trillions of dollars but has never made a penny ever since it was built. Even the Amtrak Acela line, the fastest passenger train in the US is running at a profit. So much for the anti-rail propaganda. Let's look at the facts instead of relying on blind partisan ideology.

Of course, High speed rail will not work everywhere in the US. No one is proposing to build it on a national scale. That would be stupid. But in certain dense metropolitan regions that will attract high ridership levels, HSR makes a lot of sense.






California High Speed Rail Blog » Tell Steve Lopez: HSR Is No Boondoggle
February 2, 2012

....Many HSR critics and opponents are motivated by their belief that nobody will ride trains in California. Those arguments are completely baseless, fly in the face of the available evidence, and should simply not be taken seriously. Amtrak California is setting ridership records. Remember that the independent peer review found the HSR ridership numbers to be sound.

....In fact, it is NOT a “very big if” whether the train can support itself. It’s actually highly likely that it will be able to do so. It’s not like California is proposing to do something radical and untested. We’ve known for 50 years that high speed rail works. And it turns a profit – in Japan and France, Spain, Russia, Taiwan, even the Amtrak Acela. And California compares favorably to those globally successful routes. In most of these cases, riders have flocked to HSR from planes – including the Acela.


Where do people get the idea that high-speed rail is inherently a money loser? Well that would be from the fact that just about every rail transit system in the U.S. is a money loser. The main cause of this can be summed up in a word: Unions
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,460,154 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhenomenalAJ View Post
All the people opposing it are generally not bright and forward thinking enough to realize our population is going to increase and we need more and better transportation options. They're the same type of ignorant luddite that thought our Interstate Highway System would be an expensive boondoggle that would just be a massive money drain when it has in fact been one of the most important engines in American commerce.
We had a chance with the stimulus money.
China used theirs to build high speed rail.

We broke ours up into a bazillion little projects in cities all over the US.
We repaved roads that were just paved, built turtle tunnels under highways, hike and bike trails that go nowhere and literally 1/2 of a bridge. Oh and don't forget that busy John Murtha airport renovation to the tune of over $200 million..those handful of folks that use it are mighty greatful.
And we threw some cash to green energy companies that went bankrupt.

That's what we did with our stimulus. It was supposed to go to infrastructure. I'm sure the turtles are thankful for their tunnels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 05:03 PM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,951,133 times
Reputation: 2938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Where do people get the idea that high-speed rail is inherently a money loser? Well that would be from the fact that just about every rail transit system in the U.S. is a money loser.
That's a valid point. But remember, Amtrak is mostly an ancient low speed rail system, not HSR.

Amtrak is just too slow to compete with the speed and pricing of the airlines. So of course it will be a money loser. But if Amtrak were ever upgraded to HSR standards, you bet it could compete with the airlines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 05:03 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,192,216 times
Reputation: 7693
California high-speed rail funding could be in jeopardy

Quote:
A recent poll indicates a sharp drop in public support for the project.
California high-speed rail funding could be in jeopardy - latimes.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 05:07 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,035,628 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by cisco kid View Post
Where do people get the idea that high-speed rail is inherently a money loser? The evidence seems to show otherwise. If you want to get upset over government spending and waste, then you can scream against the interstate highway system, which cost taxpayers trillions of dollars but has never made a penny ever since it was built.
The Interstate system is funded through the taxes on fuel you pay at the pump and is also vital to the self defense of this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top