Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-12-2012, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,898,352 times
Reputation: 4512

Advertisements

We always here about the bishops encouraging and coaxing Roman Catholics from pro-choice (usually) Democrat politicians in elections. One question that isn't brought up; however, is should Catholics stay away from blatently anti-gay Republicans. This is what the catechism says about treatment of homosexuals:

Quote:
2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.
So if Catholics aren't to vote for pro-choice Democrats, should anti-gay Republicans get the same "warning label" from the Church?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2012, 01:05 PM
 
8,059 posts, read 3,945,174 times
Reputation: 5356
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeybuzz View Post
The problem with religion is that they(the religious) are not on the same page. People (those that dont believe) may take them (the religious) more seriously if they were all on the same page.



living your life through "interpretation" makes you a fool.


I can't decide whether to agree or disagree with your interpretation.

Help me out, which comes first, the interpretation or the fool?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2012, 03:29 PM
 
629 posts, read 771,729 times
Reputation: 364
Or love
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top