Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2012, 10:52 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,306,967 times
Reputation: 8958

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheThrillIsGone View Post
How is that banning?

Do you know what banning means?
This proves what I have always said: Liberals can't read, and they have zero comprehension skills.

Of course, some of them are making something of this on purpose, no matter how stupid it makes them look. And, brother ... do they ever look stupid!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2012, 10:56 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,306,967 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by WesternPilgrim View Post
I call it freedom. Employers shouldn't be forced by law to subsidize practices they believe to be immoral.

If employees want it, let 'em pay for it on their own.
Exactly!

This is really funny though, seeing all these libs horrified. Getting a taste of their own medicine!!! And they don't like it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2012, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,938,118 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Keegan View Post
Not a single post in the thread has addressed a reason or rationale for giving people the things they want for free. If you insist that's incorrect, please reference the post number that discusses it. Or feel free to provide a reason of your own.
Health insurance benefits are not free, most emplyees have to also pay part of it and the rest is considered part of the employee benefits package that is considered to be part of their salary. There, that help ya catch up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2012, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,938,118 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Exactly!

This is really funny though, seeing all these libs horrified. Getting a taste of their own medicine!!! And they don't like it!
Libs have been horrified by what righties say for many years now. The ignorance and hate spewed by right-wingers has NO bounds and the "stuff" posted on this board are simply more examples why the right has lost their collective minds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2012, 11:13 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,306,967 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
"In the wake of a controversy over a requirement that religious institutions provide contraceptive coverage, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) now supports a bill that gives any employer the right to exclude any type health service that they find objectionable."

Interesting statement to say the least.
And right!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2012, 03:04 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,286 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by rikoshaprl View Post
The employer should be allowed to adjust the coverage THEY pay for in any way they want, just like they can adjust pay rates.
The insurance company will not be giving anything for free. Somehow it will get paid for. How would you like the King telling your company that you have to give some of your product away for free?
Some people are trying to say the insurance company wants to give it away for free because it is cost effective,ie cheaper than unwanted births. If that was the case they would have been giving it away all along.
Adjusting pay rates is one thing, removing a basic service that is already part of a package simply because of your political or religious view is quite a different story. The major insurers, Blue Cross, United Health, GEHA, already provide this service as part of a basic package, what would be the point in an employer removing a service that is already no cost to the employer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2012, 03:47 PM
 
Location: The Cascade Foothills
10,942 posts, read 10,254,453 times
Reputation: 6476
Quote:
Originally Posted by rikoshaprl View Post
Exactly! Are we headed in that direction with Obama?
And why - Exactly! - would you say that we're headed in a one-child limit direction with President Obama?

Because he wants to make contraception available to ALL women so THEY can choose when to have their children and how many to have?

If you think President Obama is trying to force some kind of China-like law on us, well, you're delusional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Cape Coral
5,503 posts, read 7,333,723 times
Reputation: 2250
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
Of course you have nothing to say when confronted by logic.
You couldn't even read my bold comments on that post? What is wrong with you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Cape Coral
5,503 posts, read 7,333,723 times
Reputation: 2250
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
Then please explain the point of employer's insurance to me, as far as women are concerned. You want me to go to a different doctor, or the much maligned PP, to discuss a regular health maintenance issue, because you don't want to "pay" for me to have sex.

Wot? How much sense does that make?

Neither YOU nor an employer has any idea WHY a woman chooses to go on BC. It's quite frankly none of your business. Does a woman need to go into the CEO's office now to explain that she has such heavy periods that she can't function, so she needs a gynecological visit? Is that what we need to do, to stop this ridiculousness? Embarrass employers into coverage?

So either offer proper benefits for both sexes, or don't bother.
What are you talking about? You get a physical that is covered by insurance. Your doctor gives you a prescription. You just pay for the pills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Cape Coral
5,503 posts, read 7,333,723 times
Reputation: 2250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
It IS the ultimate goal of the right-to-lifers, go to their website and they state it clearly for all to see. SO, if they got someone such as Santorum into the Whitehouse you can count on them pushing it. You seem to think that simply because a politician does not state publically that they would go this far automatically translates into them not being willing to do it, that is simple ingorant or naive thinking. The track record of politicians doing things when in office that they never said they would do, or doing the opposite of what they stated when they ran for office, is out there for all to see.
Santorums record is clear. He NEVER voted against birth control. Nice try by the truth squad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top