Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-21-2012, 03:04 PM
 
Location: Yucaipa, California
9,894 posts, read 22,014,359 times
Reputation: 6853

Advertisements

Gas jumped 6 cents today to $3.95.9. It just does not have to be that high. Also our govt is corrupt & obama only cares about the dirty rats who have donated millions to his re-election campaign.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2012, 04:34 PM
 
4,338 posts, read 7,505,101 times
Reputation: 1656
Good for my oil stocks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2012, 04:38 PM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,621,416 times
Reputation: 1544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Tell that to the struggling people who have to get to work and are just making ends meet that $10 a gallon for gas is fine.
ok here goes:
Dear struggling people:

$10 per gallon for gasoline is tolerable for me. I can budget for that sort of environment. My advice is to prepare for lower living standards, because we're all chipping in to help Wall Street whether we like it or not.

Get prepared to ride a bike, learn to cook collard greens, and lobby your local political body for mass transit and pedestrian-friendly zoning.

If you commute a long distance to work, if you live in a rural area, good luck. That may be a luxury in the future. Your kind will suffer most when the american lifestyle becomes uneconomical.

Good day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2012, 04:45 PM
 
3,335 posts, read 2,658,878 times
Reputation: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by steel7 View Post
Gas jumped 6 cents today to $3.95.9. It just does not have to be that high. Also our govt is corrupt & obama only cares about the dirty rats who have donated millions to his re-election campaign.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2012, 04:46 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,691 posts, read 18,445,049 times
Reputation: 9596
I spent $4.09 per gallon today for regular unleaded 87.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2012, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,507 posts, read 33,292,783 times
Reputation: 7621
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
I spent $4.09 per gallon today for regular unleaded 87.
That is exactly what it is at the station I refuel at (Mobil). $4.09 for regular and $4.29 for premium. But that is as of yesterday!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2012, 05:11 PM
 
4,734 posts, read 4,328,119 times
Reputation: 3235
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalCroozer View Post
Two, our wonderful brilliant Harvard educated clown of a President just let Canada sign a pact with China for oil that should have created jobs and flowed south to the USA!
It wouldn't lessen the demand for oil at all. It might create jobs in the short run - not a terrible thing, I guess -- but it's hypocritical to criticize roads to nowhere while allowing pipelines that do nothing about the oil problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2012, 05:14 PM
 
4,734 posts, read 4,328,119 times
Reputation: 3235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Obama doesn't care how much we pay for gas. He wants to push his green agenda on us . We are suppose to cut down on driving or use electric, solar or wind cars and that will make him happy. Of course we can't transition into this overnight but Obama wants it now. He wants 10 a gallon gas and he doesn't care who has to pay it or what hardships there will be on the American people. And the American people are dumb enough to vote for Obama?
This is your problem.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...20_to_2005.png

Obama didn't cause this, so stop whining about his policies. Fuel standards and energy alternatives seem like a wise investment to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2012, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,150,494 times
Reputation: 21738
an
Quote:
Originally Posted by steel7 View Post
Gas jumped 6 cents today to $3.95.9. It just does not have to be that high.
Uh, yes, it does. You ended the subsidies on ethanol. Gasoline prices rise because gasoline has ethanol.

Jumping...

Mircea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Awreetus-Awrightus View Post
no, i don't. if the supply is dwindling, you need to find an alternative source of energy.
They don't need an alternative source of energy; they need an alternative fuel, but that just ain't going to happen.

The best case scenario is an alternative to the combustion engine.

Alternatively...

Mircea

Quote:
Originally Posted by wheaties View Post
Not quite.

Koch's Pine Bend refinery in Minnesota is using heavy oil sands crude to produce gasoline:
DownstreamToday.com - News and Information for the Downstream Oil and Gas Industry
I have heard of other facilities doing the same but cannot confirm.

That isn't even possible.

Crain's Petrophysical Handbook - SPECIAL CASES -- TAR SAND with/without GAS

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...AB0j_Q&cad=rja

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R40459.pdf
(has very basic examples of assays)

That particular refinery specializes in heavy sour crudes, and has for a very long time, even before the "Big Switch" in the 1970s.

I have no doubt that they are in fact refining tar sands, but there's no way in hell they are refining that into the volume of gasoline they claim. Sure, gasoline is a natural by-product from the refinement of any type of oil, very light, light, intermediate, heavy or very heavy.

Pretty much if you refine oil then you get gasoline. It cannot be helped. The difference is in the quantity of gasoline that you get per barrel based on the type of oil, and that is what a crude oil assay determines. Look at the cut-offs (boiling points) for tar sands.

Which is more profitable: operating 10 refineries using light oil and getting 22 gallons of gasoline per barrel or operating 10 refineries using heavy oil and getting 3 gallons of gasoline per barrel?

That is why the US started importing light oil in the first place.

It was either build 500 gazillion refineries to refine all of the nasty heavy oil in the US, or build 2 dozen refineries and import light oil. Which is cheaper? Which is cheaper in the short-term? The long-term? Which is environmentally safer: 500 gazillion refineries or 2 dozen?

Okay, a little hyperbole there. Ten refineries at 100,000 barrels per day o heavy oil is 3 Million gallons of gasoline, but 10 refineries running light oil would get 22 Million gallons of gasoline.

3 Million versus 22 Million. Price is based on Supply & Demand, how much will that 3 Million gallons of gasoline cost if 150 Million SUV-drivers are screaming for it?

There's a trade off here. Chalk that up to "Opportunity Costs" if you want.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wheaties View Post
KXL is designed to increase prices.
I don't see how. Condensate, very light, light, intermediate, heavy and very heavy oils each have their own benchmarks and the prices between those oils varies greatly.

The volume of heavy or very heavy oils on the world market has no bearing on the price of light oils (Brent Blend is the benchmark) or intermediate oils (WTI is the benchmark).

Tar sands diesel would have 5,000 ppm Sulfur, which cannot be used in the US, but can be used in other countries. In the US it was 500 ppm until S15/USLD reduced it to 15 ppm. That's one reason diesel is so expensive.
It's more profitable to export.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wheaties View Post
"PADD III is particularly attractive given the size and complexity of the refineries. Western Canadian crude oil, particularly bitumen blends, could compete in this market with imports from Venezuela and Mexico, particularly since it has recently been heavily discounted in the U.S. Midwest. Increased demand in this market would likely result in higher netbacks for Canadian heavy producers for two reasons: first, it would take volumes away from the Midwest market; and second, it could move the pricing parity point of heavy sour further south where Canadian heavy crudes would compete against other heavy oil imports."
Oh I know this. I've seen that somewhere before. The Pine Bend refinery runs mostly Canadian Hardisty, which is an heavy oil on a par with Alaskan, California Heavy, Oklahoma Sour and Louisiana Heavy.

Venezuela and Mexico; that would be Boscan and Mayan respectively which are both very heavy oils. All three of those refineries at Port Arthur, Texas (where KXL terminates) run intermediate and heavy oils. One of them runs Uinta Basin Black Wax which is also a very heavy oil (I think Premcor -- not sure on that one). Valero just expanded Motiva to handle an extra 45,000 bpd and that is just for very heavy oils.

Okay, I get it now. It was a woman who wrote that? I think she's saying it'll pose a challenge to the benchmark of very heavy oils and in that context she might be correct. Still, all heavy oils are discounted. Arab Heavy, Iran Heavy, Gimboa (Angola), Heidrun (Norway) are all discounted. There world is literally awash in heavy oils. If you're a 3rd World Country that's great, but sucks to be a 1st World Country.

Oiling...

Mircea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don9 View Post
Everything I listed influences speculation ...
Only in your wildest dreams. Are you sure Chemtrails don't influence oil prices? Maybe Chemtrails influence speculators. I'm sure you can come up with a chart that shows the correlation of Chemtrails vs Oil Speculation.

Perhaps HAARP has an effect. Better go check to see if the atmospheric temperatures over the Ghewar Field have increased. Or wait, maybe you should look at the atmospheric temperatures over NYMEX.

You can theorize that HAARP is beaming speculative thoughts into the heads of speculators. If you try real hard, maybe you can come up with a graph showing correlations between Chemtrails, HAARP and Speculators.

Speculating...


Mircea

Quote:
Originally Posted by citizenkane2 View Post
Dude ....we're sitting on oil that we're too stupid to go after!! We're a long way from depletion.
Sure, we can turn half of the US into a huge open pit quarry and the other half into a big gob cesspool for the waste water run-off.

Quote:
How much water is required to produce one barrel of oil from the oil sands? The water requirements for oil sands projects range from 2.5 to 4.0 barrels of water for each barrel of bitumen produced.
NEB - Energy Reports - Canada's Oil Sands: Opportunities and Challenges to*2015 -*Questions and Answers

Water? We don't need no stinking water.

Depleting...


Mircea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Actually, it's heavily set by demand in the short term.

Not everyones gas consumption curve is price in-elastic.

Speculation can be a short term factor but that gate swings both ways and tends to be a zero-sum-game over the longer term.

Lots and lots of factors go into this.
Generally, it's inelastic over the short-term, but shifts to elastic over the long-term.

That's why oil embargoes always fail.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Um, to the people screaming about high prices in California.

1) High taxes
2) Special blends due to the laws you guys have passed re: pollution
3) Your property costs and state environmental regulations are big factors as well.

This is why ALL else being equal some gas station on a corner in an expensive area in CA may need to charge a lot more than one in a low-cost real-estate area. High capital investment needs more profit to make a reasonable rate of return.
Those people live in California and they can't figure that out?

Okay. Whatever. I guess it's a good thing they are involved.


Quote:
West Coast Retail Gasoline Prices

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee for the opportunity to testify today.
As you know, gasoline prices have risen sharply in recent weeks, with prices for regular grades now up over 20 cents per gallon across the country, and additional increases likely to follow. While the largest increases have occurred in the Midwest and Gulf Coast regions, average prices on the West Coast are still the highest in the country at over $1.70 per gallon (Figure 1). Higher still, is regular grade reformulated gasoline (RFG) in California, which is averaging nearly $1.83 per gallon, with premium grades averaging over $2.02 per gallon. When gasoline prices reach these levels, consumers and policy makers demand to know the underlying causes. My testimony summarizes these factors, beginning with the drivers behind the West Coast's elevated prices.




Why West Coast Gasoline Is Often the Most Expensive in the Nation


Gasoline prices on the West Coast are usually the highest in the nation, largely due to several factors. First, the West Coast is geographically isolated, with petroleum markets typically self-sufficient. That is, usually gasoline demand is almost entirely supplied from West Coast refineries. When supplies get tight, it can take weeks for added supply to arrive from outside the region. To satisfy consumption, West Coast refineries operate at relatively high levels, especially during the peak summer season. When refinery or other distribution problem occur, West Coast markets tighten very quickly, causing prices to rise quickly. Since the entire West Coast market is interconnected, price pressures in one area often affect the whole region.



The second reason West Coast prices are typically higher is that California, which comprises the dominant share of the West Coast market, uses a unique type of reformulated gasoline. California RFG must conform to more stringent requirements than Federally-mandated RFG, making it more expensive to produce. With no short-term "complying" supply readily available, significant shifts in markets conditions can cause large price changes.



Still another, but often unrecognized factor, is that not only does California consume more gasoline than any other state, nearly 39 million gallons daily in 1999, but in recent years, demand has grown at a pace roughly 2 to 4 times its production capacity growth. These factors combine to put pressure on refineries to produce at near maximum rates. With the balance between supply and demand so fragile, any problems with infrastructure, whether refining or distribution, cause prices to increase substantially. An April 2000 General Accounting Office (GAO) report noted that while California had not experienced more price "spikes" than other regions, the increases experienced were larger. This finding is consistent with a system operating with a finely tuned balance between supply and demand, with little or no room for error.


Although California strongly influences gasoline market conditions for the entire West Coast, it can impact other regions of the country as well - especially this year. A problem in California can result in extra supplies of gasoline being purchased on the Gulf Coast for delivery to the West Coast. These marginal barrels add price pressure to the Gulf Coast, which supplies not only the Gulf region, but also the East Coast and the Midwest. With the gasoline balance very tight in these other regions, especially the Midwest, additional product demand from California can increase prices in areas East of the Rocky Mountains. In closing, I would like to focus briefly on the rest of the country.
http://www.eia.gov/FTPROOT/presentat...mony/index.htm

Not screaming...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2012, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,213 posts, read 26,166,435 times
Reputation: 15617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Obama doesn't care how much we pay for gas. He wants to push his green agenda on us . We are suppose to cut down on driving or use electric, solar or wind cars and that will make him happy. Of course we can't transition into this overnight but Obama wants it now. He wants 10 a gallon gas and he doesn't care who has to pay it or what hardships there will be on the American people. And the American people are dumb enough to vote for Obama?
Putting aside whether he has responsibility or not, do you really think that $10 gas would help his reelection campaign, seriously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top