U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-27-2012, 06:29 PM
 
9,232 posts, read 8,373,624 times
Reputation: 14758

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat View Post
Illinois’ preexisting protections were “loophole-ridden” and only applied to babies who were considered to have “sustainable survivability,” leaving pre-“viable” newborns unprotected.

The Chicago Tribune reported that “prosecutors in IL entered into a consent decree in 1993 agreeing not to prosecute doctors for apparent or alleged violations of the law based on ‘born alive’ definitions or other definitions.

A de facto legalization of infanticide under certain conditions was already in place in Illinois, and Obama’s votes blocked measures to end it.
Okay, here we go, again:

Dictionary.com

Infanticide
1. the act of killing an infant.
2. the practice of killing newborn infants.
3. a person who kills an infant.

Infant
1. a child during the earliest period of its life, especially before he or she can walk; baby.
2. Law . a person who is not of full age, especially one who has not reached the age of 18 years; a minor.
3. a beginner, as in experience or learning; novice: The new candidate is a political infant.
4. anything in the first stage of existence or progress.

I "get" that you are against the termination of pregnancy. But seriously, the accusation you've made makes you look -- well, radically moronic, I am sorry to say.

Truly, try to come to some sense of reality -- or at least learn the language.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-27-2012, 07:40 PM
 
Location: Ohio
3,439 posts, read 6,009,348 times
Reputation: 2699
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgia dem View Post
let me follow your logic
adulterer/christian

OR:

Infanticide

think I will go with the wife cheat and christian instead of an that kills babies after they are born
now, you choose~

so a dead baby is nothing but a non issue
and your party is the one of peace and love??
horse crap!

Apples and Oranges ... How do you know MY position on Abortion, this infanticide thing is still a non-issue and the people bringing it up do so because they have nothing of their own to stand on.

There is NO killing of babies after they are born(not how they claim), it was already covered under State law.

Ya'll need to read back FOUR years, this was covered back then and proven to be a non-issue.

Maybe ya'll should bring up Sanitorium's wife working for an Abortion Doctor and later killing her baby to save her life but other women must die under the same conditions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top