Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-29-2012, 10:10 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,123,773 times
Reputation: 9409

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by noexcuseforignorance View Post
I typically always do. Feel free to search all of my posts. In places where I put forward ideas, I back them up. A good example would be the thread about the Brazilian airline winning US military business for light planes. You can search for it. You can also lookup the thread I started about the Republican primary.

In terms of your assertion here, I'm not putting forward an opinion as there's not enough data or analysis in place right now to give one. All you have is one or two editorials about this and a rush by people to get emotional about it.

There's an old saying that goes, "Better to keep your mouth shut and be assumed the fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt". Other than the 1 NY Post editorial, there's really not much data available on this yet and if people don't really know what they're talking about, they should stay quiet on things. That goes back to my left has no monopoly on ignorance comment.
And yet you have the gall to come forth and tell us we haven't done our "research?"

What a freaking joke!

Again, change your screen name!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-29-2012, 10:10 AM
 
6,902 posts, read 7,537,921 times
Reputation: 2018
wasn't there a thread yesterday that listed all of the corporate backers for Willard? Wasn't JP Morgan Chase one of the largest banks in the U.S one of his backers? Be careful who your calling the "Messiah". It appears there's a new Sherrif in town that have the bankers puckering up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2012, 10:16 AM
 
3,045 posts, read 3,193,246 times
Reputation: 1307
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
And yet you have the gall to come forth and tell us we haven't done our "research?"

What a freaking joke!

Again, change your screen name!
Yes, I do because it's obvious that none of you had or you wouldn't have posted about it. None of you really know what's going on with the writedown or the reasons. That's why I'm calling you all out on your BS.

Also, I easily shot down your theory that I don't back up what I say. I see you had no comment on that.

Quote:
wasn't there a thread yesterday that listed all of the corporate backers for Willard? Wasn't JP Morgan Chase one of the largest banks in the U.S one of his backers? Be careful who your calling the "Messiah". It appears there's a new Sherrif in town that have the bankers puckering up.
It's Mitt and all candidates with any chance of winning get money from the financial industry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2012, 10:18 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,856,573 times
Reputation: 18304
Actually looking back many of your threads were backed only by just opinion. Like your claiming that Mccain's stimulus would have been the same as Obama's. Anyone who looked at the spending of the stimulus can easily see even Obama's wasn't what it was sold as;basically a infrstructure plan that would creat massive blue collar jobs. Its mere speculation on where the money would have been spent under McCain on your part . But that is fine since this is a forum ;but don't call others Ignorant as you so often do.That not discussion.Its name calling pure and simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2012, 12:51 PM
 
3,498 posts, read 2,218,190 times
Reputation: 646
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
Forget helping out the 99%.....

The Obama administration will let some of the country’s largest banks protect about $308 billion in profitable second mortgages on their books by laying off some of the losses incurred in modifying mortgages onto the pension funds and mutual funds that own the homes’ first mortgages.

DC to banks: Keep $308B - NYPOST.com
So why are people who pro-corporate types who defend banks to the hilt criticizing Obama? The same people who criticize Obama for doing this accuse him of waging class warfare against corporations and the rich. It makes no sense. If I didn't know any better, I'd swear that this thread and the comments are from Occupiers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top