Stone Age Europeans were first Americans

[Mircea]

Originally Posted by Fred314X

Apparently, you overlooked two key words: radical and theory. And when you put these two words together, you need plenty of proof before the idea metamorphoses from theory into fact.

Originally Posted by Skinny Puppy

So theory equals fact? Does that rule apply to evolution, global warming, etc..

So which part of "They have already proven Europeans were here prior to 13,000 BCE" did you not understand?

Apparently what we have here is a



So here have archaeological evidence through DNA that a man did not belong to any of the Haplogroups in the Americas, but did match Haplogroups in Europe and you're saying what, exactly?

The guy walked from Europe over the Ural Mountains, climbed to the top of a glacier that was 1 to nearly 2 miles thick, then trekked more than 5,000 miles (without an oxygen supply) from Moscow to Olympia?

Because, that would be like "stupid."

Maybe you both think the guy sailed in a dugout canoe down the western European coast, down the western African coast, rounded Cape Horn then crossed the Indian Ocean and then the Pacific Ocean and ended up in up-state Washington?

Because, that would be like really "stupid."

Or do you believe that the guy sailed in his dugout canoe from Europe to US East Coast and then what, climbed up atop a glacier that was 1 to nearly 2 miles thick or did he skirt the glaciers and walk from the US East Coast to the West Coast. Alone. As in by himself?

Or perhaps you think he was abducted by drunk extra-terrestrials who gave him an anal probe and then dumped his body in up-state Washington confusing the Cascades with the Alps?

Okay, so maybe you're not Big Brains, but you could at least try a little imagination once in a while.

Maybe I should point out that it was just 54 years ago when scientists were saying that it was impossible for mountains to exist on the Antarctic continent. Yeah, that's right. If you were in high school in 1958, your text book would say something to the effect that the weight of the glaciers both depressed and eroded the surface of Antarctica; and therefore there are no mountains or rivers or lakes or life.

The found mountains in 1958; rivers and lakes in the mid-1980s (just 30 years ago) and life in the mid-1990s (just 20 years ago).

Anyway, it is not a theory, it is a fact that Europeans were here more than 15,000 years ago. The existence of those artifacts only supports that claim.

Archaeologically....

Mircea

[The Unbreakable]

What is the funniest thing about people who assert such racist buffoonery, is that early Europeans of that era looked like:

Early Europeans still resembled modern tropical peoples - some resemble modern Australian and Africans, more than modern Europeans.. Nor does the picture get any clearer when we move on to the Cro-Magnons, the presumed ancestors of modern Europeans. Some were more like present-day Australians or Africans, judged by objective anatomical observations." (Christopher Stringer, Robin McKie (1998). African Exodus. Macmillan, p. 162)

Also, white skin was not even around during that era in human history:






So if one really wants to go with that finding, it would essentially mean that the original Americans were tropically adapted African migrants

[whogo]

Originally Posted by RPON

No. It is part of destroying the liberal myth that Indians were here first. 1 by one we take back this nation and one by one we destroy the myths the liberals have been feeding us for 100 years.

Whether they came from Asia, Africa or Europe originally they were all referred to as Indians by the wave of European immigrants that arrived in the last half of a millinea.