Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
IMO, the passenger should have been allowed access to normal communication. Stopping him was not unwarranted, but the process itself shouldn't be an ordeal.
IMO, the passenger should have been allowed access to normal communication. Stopping him was not unwarranted, but the process itself shouldn't be an ordeal.
If he was a genuine threat, allowing him "normal
communication" might give him the chance to warn
co-conspirators or call a cell phone that triggers a bomb.
If you want to use an airport or an airline, you have to abide by their terms uf use.
By buying a ticket and entering the airport, you are deemed to have consented to these.
If it involves being searched, either overtly, or covertly, then so be it.
If you do not agree with these T&C's, then you do not buy an airline ticket, or enter an airport.
If you enter, you consent to be searched.
Simple as that.
No system is 100& accurate, and mistakes wil undoubtedly be made, but as the terrorist threat changes and they look for new ways to beat security and kill people, I am glad that the scanners are in place
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
