Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh big deal. This is funny. On one hand, women want free BC so they CAN stick things inside them whenever they want, but THIS is a no no? Hey, if you wanna play, you have to pay!
This is most abhorrent comment I have ever read on this forum.
Negative, because no jury alive would prosecute a woman for doing so, and your tax dollars would now pay for her health care .
The doctors should be prosecuted and made to pay for these women's healthcare costs if there are complications from her abortion that puts her in a public hospital.
Oh big deal. This is funny. On one hand, women want free BC so they CAN stick things inside them whenever they want, but THIS is a no no? Hey, if you wanna play, you have to pay!
So because a woman has sex she should be shamed just because she enjoys the act? Your logic resembles that of a certain country in east europe .
The doctors should be prosecuted and made to pay for these women's healthcare costs if there are complications from her abortion that puts her in a public hospital.
You have proven with post after post that this is not about medical necessity, it's about punishing women for having an abortion, so may as well punish the doctors too, right?
This issue is political suicide, and even the R's in PA are wising up to that.
The doctors should be prosecuted and made to pay for these women's healthcare costs if there are complications from her abortion that puts her in a public hospital.
Oh they can try, but again who will convict them? How many trials did dr kevorkian get off on? And that was a issue far fewer people agreed with. You will be putting states up against the powerful AMA with it's attorneys so the likely hood of you seeing a conviction is akin to me winning the powerball.
Because lack of seat belts can affect other people and not just you. A person flying out the window of their car at high speeds can be dangerous to other people. There is a balance between public goods and private choices in life. That's why the right to do what you want is not absolute.
The same could be said of abortion. It doesn't only affect the mother. In that case for sure one human loses their life.
The same could be said of abortion. It doesn't only affect the mother. In that case for sure one human loses their life. Don't they get a choice?
Except it is not relevant since abortion is legal. And in no case has the medical field or federal law determined that life begins at conception, or a fetus is due the same rights as a human being. And even if that is the case it still doesn't prove that having a sonogram is in that fetuses best interest and lack of one would damage them anymore.
The doctors should be prosecuted and made to pay for these women's healthcare costs if there are complications from her abortion that puts her in a public hospital.
Already covered, that's what malpractice insurance is for. Plus, a doctor can be suspended or loose their license. So what's your point?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
.
