Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, it's about racism. Plain and simple. It sticks in the craw of many of the extremists who inhabit this forum site that a black man is the President, and that a black family lives in the White House ... instead of opening it's doors for others, cleaning the bathrooms, and washing the dishes. The standards they apply to former and white Presidents is so very different. That's my observation.
Can you take any of your words and prove that I, or anybody, here are more racist than you sound?
Oh, sure he could have...he could have asked the same prosecution team that was gunning for him in the hopes of making him lose his seat, to wait til after the election.
We knew at the time it was all political.
Well we did know that but I didn't like Stevens for the bits of crap he managed to push through and didn't really care. I was so stupid that I didn't realize that such things as Stimulus and Obamacare could be pushed through a Senate like we had after he was defeated and died.
Oprah Winfrey? You just lost what little credibility you may have had.
There were and still are many black people I would be happy to vote for even against a white Democrat but none can get nominated as long as the establishment runs things. However, I agree with you about Oprah Winfrey since she worked so hard for Obama.
The same thing I always have: Opinion
The letter after his name has a lot to do with it. People's viewpoints also change from time to time and in a free country this is allowed. I'm sick and tired of Obama being given a free pass for his epic failures through accusations of racism toward anyone who disagrees or calls him out when he should be called out.
How is Obama responsible for any of this, BUSH was president. Maybe it is the fact that you point the finger at Obama without know if he did anything that makes others question if you are a racist.
As for firing any of the lawyers, would it be wise to wait on the report??? From the article about the finding in the report:
Schuelke concluded the misconduct didn’t warrant criminal contempt charges because the prosecutors didn’t violate specific court orders.
How is Obama responsible for any of this, BUSH was president. Maybe it is the fact that you point the finger at Obama without know if he did anything that makes others question if you are a racist.
As for firing any of the lawyers, would it be wise to wait on the report??? From the article about the finding in the report:
Schuelke concluded the misconduct didn’t warrant criminal contempt charges because the prosecutors didn’t violate specific court orders.
and the OP's premise, that attacking Stevens was a way to push Obamacare through a "bogus trial" is hence null and void.
If you disagree with one president 100% of the time, including things that you approved of when another president was in office who happened to have a different skin colour did, what else would you call it?
Being president
Senator Obama told the Boston Globe in 2007 "the president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the (U.S.) nation."
100 percent of the time? really? When the repubs disagreed with Clinton it was for the same nonsense, he had a D by his name.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.