Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Pass this information on to everyone you know and every site that you know of. They ARE trying to shut this up the way they did with 911. DON'T LET THEM DO THIS!!!
And who knows is these were just a PART of the attacks they have planned!! They have another "stand down" scheduled for 9/14 the way they did when the 9/11 attacks happened!!! Don't let the TYRANTS get away with their plans!
- - - - - - -
Updated 8 September 2007 at 1111 HRS EDT
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY UNCOVERED IN NUCLEAR "MISTAKE"!
SHIPMENT OF LIVE NUCLEAR WARHEADS FROM NORTH DAKOTA TO LOUISIANA WAS NO MISTAKE
THE LIVE WARHEADS WERE REMOVED FROM THEIR SECURE NUCLEAR STORAGE SAFES AFTER ENTRY AND CONFIRMATION OF PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORIZATION!
Reports that five nuclear warheads were "accidentally" shipped by B-52 from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana are false. It was no mistake; it was a criminal conspiracy to launch nuclear terrorist attacks against five U.S. cities!
Military investigators have confirmed to The Hal Turner Show that President Bush's personal Presidential authorization code authorized the removal of five 150 kiloton nuclear warheads from their secure nuclear storage safes.
Those Investigators also confirmed that the cruise missiles in which those warheads were placed, were mounted on the wings of the B-52 and not placed in the belly of the plane with other missiles headed for decommissioning.
When those nuclear cruise missiles arrived at Barksdale AFB, Investigators say plans were made to move those warheads off the base, allowing them to be used for what was to be a massive, nuclear "terrorist" strike against five U.S. cities. They speculate the attacks would have been blamed on AL-Qaida and used as an excuse to impose Martial Law in the U.S.
Government officials are scrambling to silence this investigation becuase it proves definitively that President George W. Bush was personally complicit in planning terrorist attacks against his own country for the purpose of declaring Martial law, merging the United States with other countries after we've been "crippled" by massive nuclear attacks, implementing "one world government" to "prevent anything like this from ever happening again" and, of course, remaining in power forever as absolute Dictator.
Elements inside the U.S. Military are aggressively seeking to arrest President Bush while top Brass in the military is doing everything possible to quash the crisis.
They leaked this information to me because efforts to "spin" and cover-up what really happened are overwhelming righteous efforts to hold the President accountable for his acts.
Investigators have been removed from the case and re-assigned. All have been threatened with arrest and prison if they reveal what they know.
Investigators have told The Hal Turner Show "the scope and grandeur of this conspiracy is so vast, so intertwined in the upper echelons of military and political power, that it is almost impossible to believe."
They went on to say that career Military Brass are putting their own personal interests (careers and pensions) ahead of national security because they are terrified of the consequences of this situation being made public.
,,,,,implementing "one world government" to "prevent anything like this from ever happening again" and, of course, remaining in power forever as absolute Dictator.
Gawd, I just love a good conspiracy theory
'Specially when it's 'spoused by a pro-white right-wing nut job. That a big relief from those friggin' troofers. Just means can't be nearly as bad as we thought... ???remaining in power forever???
'Specially when it's 'spoused by a pro-white right-wing nut job. That a big relief from those friggin' troofers. Just means can't be nearly as bad as we thought... ???remaining in power forever???
Dude, that'll never get past the Canadian border.
There are rules on the books that will allow martial law after another attack. What's to prevent another incident of Hitler? That's how he did his thing.
Here's a test for authenticity--if the original order authorizes "nuclear" attacks, relax--it's only a hoax.
BUT--(and this could save your life)---if the original order authorizes "Nuke-yuller" attacks, then HEAD FOR THE HILLS ON THE DOUBLE----that's THE DECIDER'S work, and he must be Dead Serious!!!!
Here's a test for authenticity--if the original order authorizes "nuclear" attacks, relax--it's only a hoax.
BUT--(and this could save your life)---if the original order authorizes "Nuke-yuller" attacks, then HEAD FOR THE HILLS ON THE DOUBLE----that's THE DECIDER'S work, and he must be Dead Serious!!!!
That's the funniest thing I've read all day! Thank you, macmeal!
There is much more to this story than we are being led to believe.
1. Why report it to the media?
2. Why announce there is a stand down on the 14th to review protocol? I thought we were at "war"? It does not make sense.
Either way you cut it, it is oddly disturbing. More to the picture than meets the eye, here. Nukes aren't transported without many, many hurdles to cross.
On a brighter note, who does everyone like in the NFL games next weekend?
There are rules on the books that will allow martial law after another attack. What's to prevent another incident of Hitler? That's how he did his thing.
It is not unusual for martial law to be declared when a state of anarchy erupts as did in NOLA following Katrina. You can thank the fine, ignorant thugs that fired at relief workers for prompting the confiscation. Also with the amount of looting and the number of empty stores and residences, the ability to steal guns was easy.
I'm not saying I'm a fan of exactly how it was handled, but its not like it was some peaceful city having a normal, fun week, business as usual until big bad brother came to town strictly to steal guns.
Actually, the ONLY problem I have with the way they handled it is that private citizens rightfully in possesion of a firearm that is theirs would be rendered unable to protect themselves should a criminal decide to assault them or shoot them to steal any food or goods they had. I think they should have confiscated abandoned guns for sure, but there was no good way about deciding who had guns rightfully, and who was carrying a stolen or unregistered firearm stolen from looting homes and businesses. That didn't mean its okay to take them all since they weren't sure.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I 
