Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
50% of the country saying they won't vote for Obama is NOT THE SAME THING as 50% of the country being crazy birthers who don't believe he is a legitimate president. Good grief!!!! Get a grip. More than 50% of the country didn't vote for McCain....including me. But that sure doesn't mean that we didn't believe he wasn't a citizen. More than 50% of the country didn't want George W. Bush to be the president but that sure doesn't me that they didn't think he was a legitimate president. Good grief.
Thanks for changing what my simple sentence said!! I never said anything about voting. 1/2 this country does not believe obama is eligible!
END OF STORY.
Typical Liberal response - change the sentence to something different!!
bull. His argument wasn't against the war, it was that the volunteer military is "unequal". He wants racial balance, quota's. In other words, he wants forced servitude.
We can argue all day what his real motivations were, bottom line none of his bills have come to fruition so there is no military draft, and we aren't anywhere near a military draft, so you may stop trying to explain away Ron Paul's foolish draft prediction from 2002 with irrelevant legislation.
Thanks for changing what my simple sentence said!! I never said anything about voting. 1/2 this country does not believe obama is eligible!
END OF STORY.
Typical Liberal response - change the sentence to something different!!
I was simply trying to make sense from your nonsense. Because, while it MAY be true that 50% of the country MAY not vote for Obama, it is certainly NOT true that 50% of this country does not believe him to be eligible to be president. If that is indeed your claim then you are delusional.
The numbers go up and down, on eligibility and have been skewed at times by how the poll question was worded, apparently because it can vary widely.
For Libs...a liberal source back in 2010....July I think it was and KITV reported it, and they're from BO's old stomping ground even if he wasn't born there.
SIXTY percent in mid-2010....reported from libs, hmm.
The numbers now...would be fun to bring numbers that are no more than a year old, but from multiple sources. Maybe with time, or several people helping, we can.
Is this corporation conservative? Liberal? truly non partisan in their polling and research? anybody ever heard of them?? Okay, my apologies...whether they are lib or not....are they truly professional and honest??
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
