Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2012, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Lakeside
5,266 posts, read 8,753,488 times
Reputation: 5702

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
If this picture stands up against the riverranch then it appears that the signs are quite a bit lower than the supposed construction site. I don't see how land that much lower is involved in wetlands.


Is this supposed to be coherent? The land with the signs is not the Sackett's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-21-2012, 05:25 PM
 
15,102 posts, read 8,652,825 times
Reputation: 7454
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistyriverranch View Post
Oh definitely. Because state government only has the best wishes for the freedoms of it citizens. This is Idaho. Two words: Transvaginal Ultrasounds.

If old Butch Otter (governor) figures he can make a buck with development...goodbye clean water and pristine lake.
Look .... enough of the Agenda 21 nonsense, and this communist-socialist support. Your "Government" doesn't own the land, and it is a total fraud for them to seize control of, or dictate land usage based on arbitrary EPA regulatory decrees.

This nation is literally imploding under the weight of such tyranny under the guise of environmentalism ... particularly when small private land owners are routinely run out of Dodge only for large developers to come in years later and build a golf resort circling your precious lake.

Why don't you depraved do-gooders stand up against Monsanto's destruction of the entire biosphere which is being sanctioned and allowed by your trusty ABC federal miscreants instead of drowning yourself in aspartame sweetened Kool-Aide ..... if only for 5 seconds?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2012, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Lakeside
5,266 posts, read 8,753,488 times
Reputation: 5702
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyNTexas View Post
Look .... enough of the Agenda 21 nonsense, and this communist-socialist support. Your "Government" doesn't own the land, and it is a total fraud for them to seize control of, or dictate land usage based on arbitrary EPA regulatory decrees.

This nation is literally imploding under the weight of such tyranny under the guise of environmentalism ... particularly when small private land owners are routinely run out of Dodge only for large developers to come in years later and build a golf resort circling your precious lake.

Why don't you depraved do-gooders stand up against Monsanto's destruction of the entire biosphere which is being sanctioned and allowed by your trusty ABC federal miscreants instead of drowning yourself in aspartame sweetened Kool-Aide ..... if only for 5 seconds?

Just can't post an argument without all the fallback buzzwords, huh?

Lessee....agenda 21, communist-socialist, tyranny, depraved do-gooders, Monsanto, Kool-Aide.

I think you missed pinko. That would have fit right in with your logical and reasonable argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2012, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,301,323 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistyriverranch View Post
Is this supposed to be coherent? The land with the signs is not the Sackett's.
You are full of not the Sackett's but you don't seem to have anything but your words to point out what you are saying.

BTW did you just call me a nasty name? Somehow I think this post will be deleted with yours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2012, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,301,323 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistyriverranch View Post
No, just a predictable and stupid one. For that matter..you're probably not even a man. Just a sour old woman impersonating a man on the internet.
I just pulled down my clothes and I still have a man's plumbing. I doubt that I am a sour old woman, but humor yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2012, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Lakeside
5,266 posts, read 8,753,488 times
Reputation: 5702
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
You are full of not the Sackett's but you don't seem to have anything but your words to point out what you are saying.

BTW did you just call me a nasty name? Somehow I think this post will be deleted with yours.
I believe I did. I'm very sorry. My parents taught me better than to be rude to drunken old women.
Even when they're calling me a liar themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2012, 05:37 PM
 
Location: Lakeside
5,266 posts, read 8,753,488 times
Reputation: 5702
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I just pulled down my clothes and I still have a man's plumbing. I doubt that I am a sour old woman, but humor yourself.

I just don't believe you. You sound like a woman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2012, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,301,323 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by atvwife View Post
The EPA is a joke. Don't believe me? On recent example: they contracted with a certain solar panel company that I cannot name to purchase panels to put on some buildings in NY. In their words...didn't matter if the units worked or not b/c they just needed to "look green." The cost was going to be over 500K just for this one project. So...500K of our money, to buy stuff that didn't work, so they could give us all the illusion that their buildings were green.

I don't know the full details of the Sackett story but did read up on some of it. Regardless of timelines, etc...I think they're pretty stupid if they want to build their "dream home" on swampland, filled in our not, but at the same time I don't agree with the EPA strongarming citizens with governmental power and threats of financial ruin over privately owned land.
The land in question is far from swampland. In the definition of the EPA, ICLEI, and Agenda 21 land with a mud puddle on it is wetland. I doubt that any of those people have been around when a good old Kansas thunder storm sent through the countryside.

Once you start seeing all this crap about saving animals and using that as an excuse to declare wetlands you can rest assured that the law is being bent severely. I know what wetlands in ICLEI talk are and I sure don't see them the same way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2012, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Lakeside
5,266 posts, read 8,753,488 times
Reputation: 5702
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
The land in question is far from swampland. In the definition of the EPA, ICLEI, and Agenda 21 land with a mud puddle on it is wetland. I doubt that any of those people have been around when a good old Kansas thunder storm sent through the countryside.

Once you start seeing all this crap about saving animals and using that as an excuse to declare wetlands you can rest assured that the law is being bent severely. I know what wetlands in ICLEI talk are and I sure don't see them the same way.
Don't get your panties and girdle in a twist. The entire thing is probably made up. In fact there is no Idaho or EPA. It's all a liberal lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2012, 05:58 PM
 
15,102 posts, read 8,652,825 times
Reputation: 7454
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistyriverranch View Post
Just can't post an argument without all the fallback buzzwords, huh?

Lessee....agenda 21, communist-socialist, tyranny, depraved do-gooders, Monsanto, Kool-Aide.

I think you missed pinko. That would have fit right in with your logical and reasonable argument.
I wasn't attempting to define a comprehensive list of adjectives that apply ... just a representative sample.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top