Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-26-2012, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
3,644 posts, read 6,302,789 times
Reputation: 1633

Advertisements

Quote:
Not only has the United States reduced oil imports from members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries by more than 20 percent in the last three years, it has become a net exporter of refined petroleum products like gasoline for the first time since the Truman presidency. The natural gasindustry, which less than a decade ago feared running out of domestic gas, is suddenly dealing with a glut so vast that import facilities are applying for licenses to export gas to Europe and Asia.
National oil production, which declined steadily to 4.95 million barrels a day in 2008 from 9.6 million in 1970, has risen over the last four years to nearly 5.7 million barrels a day. The Energy Department projects that daily output could reach nearly seven million barrels by 2020. Some experts think it could eventually hit 10 million barrels — which would put the United States in the same league as Saudi Arabia.

...

The Bush administration worked from the start on finding ways to unlock the nation’s energy reserves and reverse decades of declining output, with Mr. Cheney leading a White House energy task force that met in secret with top oil executives. [...]
The Bush administration also opened large swaths of the Gulf of Mexico and the waters off Alaska to exploration, granting lease deals that required companies to pay only a tiny share of their profits to the government.
I guess even the NY Times couldn't stand Obama talking about how we are producing more energy than ever before (as if he has something to do with it) and they wanted to set the record straight. Either that or thier website was hacked by an actual journalist.

Original story here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/bu...1s9pUV6Vj0Zjng
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-26-2012, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,755,730 times
Reputation: 5691
Maybe they are just doing their jobs, and they are not all liars and crooks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,074,986 times
Reputation: 3937
Just another Murdoch RWNJ toilet paper rag.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,756,720 times
Reputation: 24863
I wonder what the editors of the NYT are smoking? Muleskinner is being kind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,074,986 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
I wonder what the editors of the NYT are smoking? Muleskinner is being kind.
+1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,941,962 times
Reputation: 5661
Stuff included in the article but not included by the OP:
Quote:
How the country made this turnabout is a story of industry-friendly policies started by President Bush and largely continued by President Obama — many over the objections of environmental advocates — as well as technological advances that have allowed the extraction of oil and gas once considered too difficult and too expensive to reach. But mainly it is a story of the complex economics of energy, which sometimes seems to operate by its own rules of supply and demand.
It's best to read the entire article.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 10:51 AM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,227,271 times
Reputation: 9845
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerbacon View Post
I guess even the NY Times couldn't stand Obama talking about how we are producing more energy than ever before (as if he has something to do with it) and they wanted to set the record straight. Either that or thier website was hacked by an actual journalist.

Obama has a hand in policies that help the increase in production.

Maybe you should read the very article that you cited.

.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
3,644 posts, read 6,302,789 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
Obama has a hand in policies that help the increase in production.

Maybe you should read the very article that you cited.

.
Obama has done almost everything he can to stifle oil and natural gas production in this country (but he seems to love Brazil producing it). Yeah, he has allowed some Bush policies to continue because he has to face re-election and noone gets re-elected if gas prices are through the roof. (note: they are going through the roof anyway). If he were to get re-elected (he won't) then he would give the eco-wackos everything they want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Fairfax, VA
3,826 posts, read 3,386,268 times
Reputation: 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
Obama has a hand in policies that help the increase in production.

Maybe you should read the very article that you cited.

.

We will see in about 5 years when those "policies" are actually reviewed. All production today are due to Clinton and Bush years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 12:06 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,820,716 times
Reputation: 20030
obama has tried to shut down oil production on government lands. the increased oil production we are getting now is on private lands.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top