Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-27-2012, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,416,507 times
Reputation: 6462

Advertisements

But but he is a good kid getting his life together. Oh the humanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2012, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,760,768 times
Reputation: 5691
Hehehehe sounds like that badass old dude in the movie Gran Torino.

Seriously, both survived, and that kid will think twice about breaking and entering. Sounds just fine to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2012, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,416,507 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
LIke I said, "ATEMPTED PEST CONTROL WITHOUT A LICENSE".

I believe previous firearms convictions under a systen as draconic as Chicago's should be rendered void. This citizen needed a weapon handy and the city had no right to deprive him of his safety in his own home. Or anywhere else for that matter.
Not only that since Chicago is incapable or unwilling to stem the crime rate citizens should be able to be armed regardless of previous weapon convictions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2012, 10:37 AM
 
2,548 posts, read 2,163,372 times
Reputation: 729
Quote:
Originally Posted by scocar View Post
I love how the right always blames the media for false reporting and then they do the exact same. The story says he had 2 prior gun convictions. This probably meant he was not LAWFULLY allowed to possess a firearm. Hence the arrest for UNLAWFUL USE OF A FIREARM.
The shooter also appears to have a felony record, for theft or burglary I believe. I guess people are ok with thieves packing heat
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2012, 10:38 AM
 
2,548 posts, read 2,163,372 times
Reputation: 729
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
Not only that since Chicago is incapable or unwilling to stem the crime rate citizens should be able to be armed regardless of previous weapon convictions.
Does that include citizens with criminal records, because that is the case of the old guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2012, 10:38 AM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,238,044 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRAMERCAT View Post
Et Tu Zimmerman?

"Neighbors say they're "outraged" that an 80-year-old owner of a local tavern has been charged with shooting a burglar who broke into his home in the Englewood neighborhood on the South Side.

“What does it say to me and other senior citizens that we will be arrested if we defend ourselves?" asked Anita Dominique, head of the block club in the neighborhood. "This is an outrage.â€


Neighbors 'outraged' after man, 80, charged with shooting burglar - chicagotribune.com
The way i read it was he wasn't charged for shooting the kid. He was charged for a felon using a weapon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2012, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,599,094 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
Ok all you *******s here is a perfect example of the reason STAND YOUR GROUND laws are needed.
This situation does not compare. If someone breaks into your home, the owner have a right to disarm, shoot to wound or shoot to kill...whatever. That's the price the burglar pays when they break into someone's home.

And thank you very much republitard.

Last edited by fitzy24; 03-27-2012 at 11:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2012, 10:49 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,109,663 times
Reputation: 8527
This is why people need to read the article:

Wright was charged with one felony count of unlawful use of a weapon after police discovered he had two prior weapons convictions from 1968 and 1994, officials said. Records show Wright also was convicted of theft in 1990. Wright turned his gun over to detectives.

Reading is FUNdamental...so is reading comprehension.

Oh, and just in case people get this confused with the Zimmerman/Martin case: they weren't outside in a common area of a condo complex, the 911 dispatcher didn't tell Wright not to pursue, Martin was NOT breaking any laws and nobody was killed.

Last edited by carterstamp; 03-27-2012 at 10:57 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2012, 10:54 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,697,144 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzy24 View Post
This situation does not compare. If someone breaks into your home, the owner have a right to disarm, shoot to would or shoot to kill or whatever. That's the price the burglar pays when they break into someone's home.

And thank you very much republitard.
This situation does not compare to what? Do you even understand the reason Stand Your Ground laws are created and passed into law?

I am not comparing anything I am TELLING you this is a classic example of the reasons why SYG laws are passed.

If our current system of Jurisprudence didn't make criminals out of victims then you wouldn't need SYG laws.

Comprehension people, comprehension.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2012, 10:57 AM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,238,044 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
This is why people need to read the article:

Wright was charged with one felony count of unlawful use of a weapon after police discovered he had two prior weapons convictions from 1968 and 1994, officials said. Records show Wright also was convicted of theft in 1990. Wright turned his gun over to detectives.

Reading is FUNdamental...so is reading comprehension.

Oh, and just in case people get this confused with the Zimmerman/Martin case: they weren't outside in a common area of a condo complex, the 911 dispatcher didn't tell Wright not to pursue, and nobody was killed.
As i stated in post #16
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top