Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you support or oppose ObamaCare?
I support ObamaCare. 74 40.88%
I oppose ObamaCare. 107 59.12%
Voters: 181. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-29-2012, 02:21 PM
 
58,973 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Define a product. Do missiles count?
So now you have purchased missiles?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-29-2012, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,806,382 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
More loony logic.

And of course, always with the insult, " none of that mostly republican crap" because others don't believe as you do.

For someone who chooses such a forum name, you are FAR from being an Einstein.
Thank you for an example of loony logic, because I didn't see anything else where to respond to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
So now you have purchased missiles?
Not any less (and likely more) than you've spent on someone else's health care or social services.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,214 posts, read 11,325,556 times
Reputation: 20827
Quote:
Originally Posted by ted08721 View Post
It just puts more money into the pockets of the healthcare companies, healthcare should not be for profit.
Demand one payer healthcare for everyone.

This is the stumbling block of the entire argument -- the "not-for-profit" single-payer fantasy gauarantees uniformly poor health care and forces responsible people into the Medicaid ghetto with the riffraff one step out of the drug economy, the gangs, and the prison system
.
As long as our schools refuse to teach the simple fact that "profit" (and I'm including the returns frpom the oeration of colleges, hosptitals and your local PBS/NPR outlet) is what makes expansion of any economic activity possible, sites like this one will continue to be inundated with teenyboppers and overgrown children who see it as a dirty word. But I assure you that our unionized educational system sees no benefit in correcting that lie.

Sio the circus will continue

Last edited by 2nd trick op; 03-29-2012 at 02:41 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 08:15 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,445,137 times
Reputation: 3647
Reluctantly support. I would rather have status quo + public option, or Medicare For All, but if it is between ObamaCare and the status quo, I choose ObamaCare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,323,498 times
Reputation: 2888
Obamacare was simply a kickback to Obama's friends in the insurance industry, the pharmaceutical industry, and the unions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 09:14 PM
 
Location: on the edge of Sanity
14,268 posts, read 18,923,606 times
Reputation: 7982
Quote:
Originally Posted by ted08721 View Post
It just puts more money into the pockets of the healthcare companies, healthcare should not be for profit.
Demand one payer healthcare for everyone.

I agree and wish I could change my vote. I voted yes because I was thinking it's a beginning and better than nothing. Of course "Medicare for all" makes a lot more sense. If he had trouble getting this bill through, we know single-payer would have been impossible. I mean, there's not even a public option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2012, 05:30 AM
 
4,255 posts, read 3,478,526 times
Reputation: 992
It is a plan that was designed to fail. Some of the things in it were already laws , reason they are in it is the people trying to " fix" healthcare didnt know enough about it to fix it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2012, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Augusta, Ga.
69 posts, read 68,602 times
Reputation: 24
More Americans will like the Act as they see the publicity for what the law has already produced. Meidcare-Medicaid for all truly would be Obama cares!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2012, 11:58 AM
 
9,229 posts, read 8,543,305 times
Reputation: 14770
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
Since the Supreme Court is currently hearing the ObamaCare case, I wanted to see how everyone on the forum feels about the law.
I strongly support it, though I do recognize it is not the "end all" solution it does get us closer to where we need to be -- and yes, I believe everyone should have to be insured. If they rule against the mandatory insurance clause, then I believe we should revise existing legislation to deny anyone Medicare or Medicaid that has refused to be insured after the Court ruling. It is those that refuse to insure themselves until there is a problem that causes the drain on our reserves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2012, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Metro Detroit
256 posts, read 207,035 times
Reputation: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post
This is the stumbling block of the entire argument -- the "not-for-profit" single-payer fantasy gauarantees uniformly poor health care and forces responsible people into the Medicaid ghetto with the riffraff one step out of the drug economy, the gangs, and the prison system
.
As long as our schools refuse to teach the simple fact that "profit" (and I'm including the returns frpom the oeration of colleges, hosptitals and your local PBS/NPR outlet) is what makes expansion of any economic activity possible, sites like this one will continue to be inundated with teenyboppers and overgrown children who see it as a dirty word. But I assure you that our unionized educational system sees no benefit in correcting that lie.

Sio the circus will continue
Why is profit necessary in the insurance industry? An industry does not even create products. At least with drug companies you can defend them making money at they make a product. There is no reason why the insurance industry shouldn't be not for profit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top