Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Here is NASA on the subject....Everyone knows NASA is controlled by liberals.
FOX has lots of experts on the Global Warming fraud like Palin and Limbaugh, Hannity.
That's why I'm so informed on the subject of Global Warming. I listen to FOX not NASA, or the vast overwhelming majority of scientist that have expertise in the subject.
Sure. And we know how credible NASA is (thinking of the woman that said you could "see the deforestation from space!") What a joke. That is our NASA team .
Duh, the liberals are making tons of money from BIG SOLAR. Those scientists are SWIMMING in money. Heck, I just got my check in the mail from The Liberals for teaching about it. Now, if I can only find a place to put these piles of money. Oh, I know, I could use a new gold-plated table for my billards room.
So, what is this liberal agenda that is driving the man made global warming debate? What is the objective?
That should be obvious; the creation of a new sector of bureaucracy, not answerable to the rules of the markets and staffed by friends of the supposed illuminatii who subsrcribe to the "global warming" advocacy.
So, I shouldn't listen to the scientists. They are trained professionals, who know more about the atmosphere than anyone on this forum. I should, instead, listen to bloggers? A programmer who writes op-ed columns?
Again, there's the disconnect. Granted, a big problem is that the public doesn't have access to peer reviewed scientific journals unless they go to their local library. It'd take anyone about 5 minutes to find an article in a recent issue of Science or Nature with quality data supporting anthropogenic warming.
But what do we have access to at home? News media and blogs. Secondary sources which pick and choose the "relevant" information for us. Its a big problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h
Global warming, IF partially caused by man, can be attributed to all the hot air produced by hypocrits like Gore.
HAH... I posted from the first page taratova - Great Minds!
I can't believe people still can't connect the huge financial gains this pseudo-science is generating. Scientists first decide they have an idea, then set out to prove it. After they find even a sliver of possibility they get grants , and then it's off to the races to keep the idea floating. It was global cooling in the 50-60-70s, but there was far more money to be made on the other side of the thermometer, so they (scienctists) all jumped ship. They are nothing more than speculators using elements instead of oil and minerals, to make their fortunes.
Let me know when science can control the sun and we'll have something to discuss.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Exactly. There hasn't been a shred of credible evidence. The lie has been in order to advance a liberal agenda. Period.
.
