Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-02-2012, 12:54 AM
 
Location: Chesterfield,Virginia
4,919 posts, read 4,834,761 times
Reputation: 2659

Advertisements

How's this for bluntness and exposing the insidious underbelly of this administration?

I'm curious .. Does this bother any of the liberals on this forum?

It bothers me and I could be Obamas twin.
(EXCEPT .. I am really good looking! )

Quote:
Reverse discrimination against whites has just begun, according to Attorney General Eric Holder. Now, the exploitation of Trayvon Martin's death has thrown the cycle of racial resentment and favoritism into overdrive.

There has been much poisonous rhetoric following Trayvon Martin's death, and more is sure to come. It is hard to imagine that any other current topic could result in racial madness exceeding that tragedy. Nonetheless, an exceptionally ominous and instructive remark was recently made by Attorney General Eric Holder -- a remark more outlandish than any heard so far in our national conversation about Martin.

Attorney General Holder recently addressed the question of affirmative action, and for how long it would be required. He answered, stunningly, that reverse discrimination has only just begun: "Affirmative action has been an issue since segregation practices," Holder said. "The question is not when does it end, but when does it begin[.] ... When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled?"
Articles: Holder's Revenge
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2012, 12:57 AM
 
2,548 posts, read 2,163,590 times
Reputation: 729
I think reversing discrimination is a good idea. Why are you want to keep discrimination around?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 12:58 AM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,447,035 times
Reputation: 3050
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrClose View Post
How's this for bluntness and exposing the insidious underbelly of this administration?

I'm curious .. Does this bother any of the liberals on this forum?

It bothers me and I could be Obamas twin.
(EXCEPT .. I am really good looking! )



Articles: Holder's Revenge
Wow! Always knew it they simply are not hiding it this campaign season are they. Somehow they think they will garner more votes because of this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 12:59 AM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,447,035 times
Reputation: 3050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frugality View Post
I think reversing discrimination is a good idea. Why are you want to keep discrimination around?
No discrimination is good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 01:00 AM
 
2,548 posts, read 2,163,590 times
Reputation: 729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
No discrimination is good.
That's why reversing discrimination is good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 01:01 AM
 
4,367 posts, read 3,483,876 times
Reputation: 1431
Eric Holder is a racist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 01:03 AM
 
Location: Chesterfield,Virginia
4,919 posts, read 4,834,761 times
Reputation: 2659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frugality View Post
That's why reversing discrimination is good.
Okay .. I'm confused!
(but that was your intent .. huh? )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 01:05 AM
 
Location: Chesterfield,Virginia
4,919 posts, read 4,834,761 times
Reputation: 2659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frugality View Post
I think reversing discrimination is a good idea. Why are you want to keep discrimination around?
Maybe I missed your meaning the first time?
(It's late)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 01:05 AM
 
2,548 posts, read 2,163,590 times
Reputation: 729
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrClose View Post
Okay .. I'm confused!
(but that was your intent .. huh? )
Not sure why my post was confusing. Reversing anything that is bad is a good thing. Simple enough for you. Rising teen pregnancies are bad, reversing them is good, rising unemployment is bad, reversing it is good. Well if you hate Obama rising unemployment is good, so that was a bad example
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 01:08 AM
 
Location: Chesterfield,Virginia
4,919 posts, read 4,834,761 times
Reputation: 2659
I am angry and sad that THIS President could have been a Great unifying force in this country and yet .. He has chosen to tear us apart.

(And we are allowing it)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top