Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-03-2012, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,323,086 times
Reputation: 5480

Advertisements

OTTAWA — The Tories have promised a complete and public review of the stealth fighter program and opened the door to potential competitors after a scathing report found defence officials twisted government rules, misled ministers and Parliament, and whitewashed cost overruns and delays in a determined effort to ensure Canada purchased the F-35 jet.

Auditor-General Michael Ferguson’s scathing assessment, released today, puts the military’s own cost estimates for Canada’s involvement at $25 billion — instead of the publicly stated $16 billion — and questions assertions that Canadian industry stands to benefit from $12 billion in contracts.

The Auditor-General’s report also says the F-35 was “clearly the fighter jet of choice” as early as 2006, and that officials intentionally played up the F-35’s stealth capabilities to sidestep established purchasing guidelines.

“National Defence did not exercise the diligence that would be expected in managing a $25-billion commitment,” Ferguson said. “It is important that a purchase of this size be managed rigorously and transparently.”

The report forced immediate changes to the handling of the fighter program: “Funding will remain frozen and Canada will not purchase new aircraft until further due diligence, oversight, and transparency is applied to the process of replacing the Canadian Forces’ aging CF-18 fleet,” Public Works Minister Rona Ambrose said after the release of the review.

Ferguson’s report says Canada initially joined the F-35 program in 1997 not with the intention of purchasing the stealth fighter, but to ensure Canadian industry could win contracts associated with developing and producing the fighter.


Source: F-35 fighter jet funds frozen in wake of scathing Auditor General report | News | National Post


Now I have a Question should Canada go with the upgraded F/A-18 Super Hornet or look at the F-15SE?

Either way a mix and match with Drones makes sense for Arctic Patrols IMO...What do you guys think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2012, 12:10 PM
 
Location: England
3,261 posts, read 3,705,936 times
Reputation: 3256
What about the Euro fighter?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2012, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,113,905 times
Reputation: 4270
Can you imagine the uproar if America froze a defense contract for poor bookkeeping & cost overruns?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2012, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,323,086 times
Reputation: 5480
Quote:
Originally Posted by albion View Post
What about the Euro fighter?
The Euro Fightercould be a possiblity... that.. Or the Dassault Rafale could also be in the running as an alternative to Replace the aging CF-18 Hornets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2012, 12:19 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,691 posts, read 18,456,585 times
Reputation: 9596
The future is drones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2012, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Moderate conservative for Obama.
831 posts, read 680,667 times
Reputation: 371
Better yet, since their in bed with China, go with the J-20
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2012, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,323,086 times
Reputation: 5480
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
The future is drones.
Agreed the X-47B with Air-To-Air Refueling capability would be perfecrtfor patroling Canada's arctic for long periods of time and for NORAD Missions and still offer a bit of stealth capability if needed for future NATO Missions.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2012, 12:32 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,201,643 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone-Ranger View Post
Better yet, since their in bed with China, go with the J-20
Go with a plane that uses antique Russian jet engines obsolete electronics and non-stealth skins?

LMAO

http://rt.com/news/fifth-generation-...an-engine-261/

Last edited by plwhit; 04-03-2012 at 01:01 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2012, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
I think Canada has no reason to own ANY advanced fighter jets. They should spend one tenth the money developing autonomous drones capable of hunting down all the current and likely future aircraft that might be used to attack Canada. They have absolutely no need for weapons that have long range capacity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2012, 02:30 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,201,643 times
Reputation: 7693
Maybe the canucks should design and build their own, yathink?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top