Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-07-2012, 07:09 PM
 
1,182 posts, read 1,139,447 times
Reputation: 439

Advertisements

The Fed and the government have thrown everything they can at the deflated housing market. Record low mortgage rates, tax write offs and all kinds of gifts and gimmicks. So far nothing has worked to reinflate the housing market. So now it appears they are going to "supply side" solutions and the government is going to spend billions of tax dollars to buy and tear down millions of empty houses to take excess supply off the market. While some of these homes are for sure in bad shape, many of them could be saved if a person or a family was to earn "sweat equity" in them. Why not just give them to a family that would sign an agreement to completely repair the home and occupy it for a minimum of 5 years before selling or renting it? That would cost us nothing and put a home back on the tax rolls and house a family that otherwise might not be able to afford a home if they had to pay a big mortgage plus all the repair and maintenance cost. Without the expense of a mortgage there are many families that could afford to do the repairs needed to bring the house up to proper condition. Then you don't have empty lots all over town. It is a win, win, win. And it does not cost the rest of us anything.
Lawmakers Seek to Fund Teardowns With Gov
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2012, 07:12 PM
 
2,312 posts, read 3,663,793 times
Reputation: 1606
hi
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2012, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,179,956 times
Reputation: 6958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruin Rick View Post
The Fed and the government have thrown everything they can at the deflated housing market. Record low mortgage rates, tax write offs and all kinds of gifts and gimmicks. So far nothing has worked to reinflate the housing market. So now it appears they are going to "supply side" solutions and the government is going to spend billions of tax dollars to buy and tear down millions of empty houses to take excess supply off the market. While some of these homes are for sure in bad shape, many of them could be saved if a person or a family was to earn "sweat equity" in them. Why not just give them to a family that would sign an agreement to completely repair the home and occupy it for a minimum of 5 years before selling or renting it? That would cost us nothing and put a home back on the tax rolls and house a family that otherwise might not be able to afford a home if they had to pay a big mortgage plus all the repair and maintenance cost. Without the expense of a mortgage there are many families that could afford to do the repairs needed to bring the house up to proper condition. Then you don't have empty lots all over town. It is a win, win, win. And it does not cost the rest of us anything.
Lawmakers Seek to Fund Teardowns With Gov
Maybe they should pray for tornados, it's much cheaper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2012, 07:13 PM
 
Location: California
37,121 posts, read 42,189,292 times
Reputation: 34997
The article says the homes are "beyond repair". I don't think giving them aways is win/win. I think tearing them down and using the land for other purposes is probably the way to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2012, 07:13 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,859,570 times
Reputation: 1517
Because breaking windows is the path to prosperity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2012, 07:15 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,844,914 times
Reputation: 9283
If people are giving away houses, can I have one so that I can flip... see the problem now? Suppose you put an amendment so that you can't sell the house in five years... family moves in and finds a job in another state, what do they do with the house? Rent it out? Can I buy a house and instead of flipping it, rent it out as well? There aren't any easy solutions and leaving houses there as a blight isn't a solution either which tends to fill up squatters or worse... then there are the other city financial side as well, it cost money to run water, electricity, gas, trash, whatever to that house... would you want to run it to a neighborhood where only one person lives in that house which means you have to supply the whole empty neighborhood with city utilities and upkeep...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2012, 07:16 PM
 
Location: MASSACHUSETTS
744 posts, read 811,520 times
Reputation: 513
Nice, unfortunately not many foreclosures around my area but there are a few ugly ass abandoned houses I'd love to see torn down
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2012, 07:20 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruin Rick View Post
The Fed and the government have thrown everything they can at the deflated housing market. Record low mortgage rates, tax write offs and all kinds of gifts and gimmicks. So far nothing has worked to reinflate the housing market. So now it appears they are going to "supply side" solutions and the government is going to spend billions of tax dollars to buy and tear down millions of empty houses to take excess supply off the market. While some of these homes are for sure in bad shape, many of them could be saved if a person or a family was to earn "sweat equity" in them. Why not just give them to a family that would sign an agreement to completely repair the home and occupy it for a minimum of 5 years before selling or renting it? That would cost us nothing and put a home back on the tax rolls and house a family that otherwise might not be able to afford a home if they had to pay a big mortgage plus all the repair and maintenance cost. Without the expense of a mortgage there are many families that could afford to do the repairs needed to bring the house up to proper condition. Then you don't have empty lots all over town. It is a win, win, win. And it does not cost the rest of us anything.
Lawmakers Seek to Fund Teardowns With Gov


Instead of wrecking and in the dumpster, the wood can be resold & reused for many things. Especially old hardwoods, used in many old homes. Some homes have Oak studs. Even old Mahogany and teak can be found in old homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2012, 07:21 PM
 
1,890 posts, read 2,652,857 times
Reputation: 920
At the beginning of the article, it indicates that Ohio and Michigan has simply too many vacant homes beyond repair sitting doing nothing. I can believe that as they are in the heart of the rust belt.

Why not keep it local...? Not all areas were hit hard as Ohio and Michigan were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2012, 10:19 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,253,825 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visvaldis View Post
Maybe they should pray for tornados, it's much cheaper.
I didn't know that you believed in prayer. Hmmmm, I guess some of you think that when it will come in handy it will work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top