Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-10-2012, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis
2,526 posts, read 3,049,130 times
Reputation: 4343

Advertisements

I've always respected Ozzie Guillen's candor, and his Castro comment just makes me like Guillen even more. Being in Miami and understanding that city's powerful Anti-Castro element, Guillen could have exercised some self-censorship. But that's never been his style.

The Anti-Castro folks conveniently ignore the positive transformation that took place in Cuba after the revolution. Under Batista, Cuba was a notoriously corrupt US puppet state. The vast majority of the nation's people lived in abject squalor, with little access to education or medical care.

After the revolution, Cuba developed the best education and health care systems in Latin America. Even today, the literacy rate in Cuba is higher than that in The United States, and the infant mortality rate is lower.

Yes, Castro became a dictator, and in doing so, disappointed many who believe in political freedom. That's a big flaw. However, on the spectrum of historical world leaders; hundreds have engaged in far more malevolent behavior than has Castro, and few have done as much to improve the lot of their citizenry.

Guillen has every right to declare his respect for Castro. Those who disagree can likewise speak out. Ironically, the inability of people in Cuba to enjoy that basic right of free speech will always be remembered as the most glaring failure of Castro himself.

I hope Ozzie keeps on being Ozzie!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-10-2012, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Florida
77,005 posts, read 47,592,894 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
What is this? Fidel isn't even relevant. The Cold War has been over for over 20 years. Hell, Fidel Castro hasn't been a threat to the US since the missile crisis.



Ozzie Guillen Suspended By Marlins For Fidel Castro Comments
You can say something like that anywhere else in US, and no one cares, but you cannot say it in Miami without stirring up outrage. The club has the right to fire him for offending the fans, and I think a five game suspension is not enough. They should have fired him. The new Marlins stadium sits in Little Havana of all places, and this will cost them some fans for sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,690,316 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by tluv00 View Post
But we haven't. He is still free to say whatever he wants. He is also free to any backlash he gets for saying it.
Why is the second part of this equation so hard for people to understand?

Sure, we have freedom of speech, but, we sure don't have freedom from the consequences of that speech.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Cumberland Maine
861 posts, read 1,147,116 times
Reputation: 1823
[quote=robbobobbo;23793915]I agree the man should be able to voice his opinion freely and that his opinion of Castro shouldn't result in punishment, but let me ask you: back in the 1950s, 1960s, or even 1970s, what do you suppose would happen to almost any employee who said something like "I love Castro, he's great"?

If you knew your history, you would know the USA backed Castro in his revolution to overthrow Batista. So if you said you loved Castro in the 50s and early 60s, you would have been in the majority. But when he sought additional aid from Russia, the US turned its back on him and placed an embargo on Cuba and alienated him forever. If we had stood strongly behind him he probably never would have asked Russia for help and Cuban cigars and rum would still be available for our "legal" consumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,690,316 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
How many of you here who are still working think you should have the right to publicly criticize your boss and have nothing happen because of it? If you went on national TV and said, "My boss is a moron," would you still expect to have a job come Monday morning?

Or, if you went on national TV and ticked off a bunch your company's customers, would you expect nothing to happen to you?

This isn't a free speech issue, it's not an issue of government or even Major League Baseball. It's an issue between an employer (the Marlins) and an employee (the manager). His comments hurt business and he got laid off.

What's so hard to understand about that?
Makes perfect sense to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis
2,526 posts, read 3,049,130 times
Reputation: 4343
[quote=TerryDactyls;23798590]
Quote:
Originally Posted by robbobobbo View Post
I agree the man should be able to voice his opinion freely and that his opinion of Castro shouldn't result in punishment, but let me ask you: back in the 1950s, 1960s, or even 1970s, what do you suppose would happen to almost any employee who said something like "I love Castro, he's great"?

If you knew your history, you would know the USA backed Castro in his revolution to overthrow Batista. So if you said you loved Castro in the 50s and early 60s, you would have been in the majority. But when he sought additional aid from Russia, the US turned its back on him and placed an embargo on Cuba and alienated him forever. If we had stood strongly behind him he probably never would have asked Russia for help and Cuban cigars and rum would still be available for our "legal" consumption.

The US certainly didn't back Castro or the Cuban Revolution. Our government was an ardent supporter of Fulgencio Batista. Aside from the atrocities Batista perpetrated on his own people, he allowed US corporate interests and organized crime to use Cuba as a safe haven.

The revolution started brewing in the early fifties, and was indigenous to Cuba. It's safe to assume that US intelligence agencies were aware of much of this, however, the abdication of Batista clearly took the United States government by surprise.

After the revolution, Castro attempted to obtain US support. Any assistance to the new government was summarily rejected by The US. After being turned away by The United States, Castro sought assistance from The USSR. The Soviets were only too happy to find A North American proxy during the "Cold War".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 04:36 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,150,494 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
What is this? Fidel isn't even relevant. The Cold War has been over for over 20 years. Hell, Fidel Castro hasn't been a threat to the US since the missile crisis.
Castro was never a threat to you. Not ever. Not in this universe, and not in any multiple or parallel universes that theoretically may or may not exist.

Historically...

Mircea

Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro69 View Post
..and we've lost our Freedom of Speech.

While I don't agree with what Ozzie said, as an American I will defend it. But it appears that the PC Police and Thought Police have won.

We have hit that slippery slope and have lost. Society as we know it is gone.
You didn't lose anything at all.

Apparently you don't seem to be able to grasp the concept.

The 1st Amendment protects you only from your government.

The 1st Amendment does not protect you from:

1] your children
2] your spouse
3] your family
4] your friends
5] your neighbors
6] your employer (unless your employer is the government)
7] your co-workers
8] your employees
9] your bosses, supervisors, managers et al
10] the average Jane or Joe in the street.
11] corporations, businesses, enterprises
12] for-profit or non-profit groups
13] any other non-government entity

As an employee, you are bound by the Master-Servant relationship, and you must do or comply with the rules of your Master.

If you don't like it, then you are free to be your own Master and make your own rules anytime you are so inclined to do so.

Constitutionally...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 05:14 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 21,994,436 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
You can say something like that anywhere else in US, and no one cares, but you cannot say it in Miami without stirring up outrage. The club has the right to fire him for offending the fans, and I think a five game suspension is not enough. They should have fired him. The new Marlins stadium sits in Little Havana of all places, and this will cost them some fans for sure.
ESPN had folks out in front of the stadium protesting demanding their money back for tickets and calling for old Ozzie to get fired. I don't think he'll make it through the week myself. I doubt this is what they had in mind when they opened the new stadium and brought in Reyes, Buehrle and Zambrano.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 05:34 PM
 
Location: Florida
77,005 posts, read 47,592,894 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
ESPN had folks out in front of the stadium protesting demanding their money back for tickets and calling for old Ozzie to get fired. I don't think he'll make it through the week myself. I doubt this is what they had in mind when they opened the new stadium and brought in Reyes, Buehrle and Zambrano.
No, this is not what they had in mind. The Marlins should have fired him immediately. The 1st amendment does not protect people from losing their jobs due to stupid comments. This thing is all over the national news and it irks the local anti-communists even more seeing the team is not firing him even after all the attention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,520,451 times
Reputation: 7807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Castro was never a threat to you. Not ever. Not in this universe, and not in any multiple or parallel universes that theoretically may or may not exist.


Mircea

So, his allowing the Soviets to station nuclear missiles there wasn't a threat to us?

Really?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top