Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I've had 3 documented stokes. The last one in 2003 took away all my sight. Doctors said I would never regain my sight. 95% lost in the right eye 75% in the left eye. I told each of them -You two clowns need to go back to school and learn. Less than 1 month later all sight was restored.
They were each SHOCKED!
No! Please tell me how easy it would have been to do it YOUR WAY.
Again you place yourself above and higher than God in (your knowledge).
You have slapped HIM in the face twice today.
tisk tisk tisk.
It is wonderful that you had a recovery, but don't you think that people that believe in evolution as opposed to creationism have had surprising and unexpected recoveries too? Look, if it works for you, great.
Why are the creationist so negative?
Instead of trying to discredit evolution why don't they put forth their case (if they have one) for creationism?
The heavens declare the Glory of God - The universe is all that one has to ponder - I guess another amoeba crawled off some planet to design that precision that is present in the universe.
Out of chaos comes precise timing and measurements. A fish did it!
If the highlight is something you get, why are you pushing your agenda against Evolution? It ain't about origin of life.
Yep: They do this every time! They hope to obfuscate the issue by this incessant conflation of the origins of original life and how that life, once developed, differentiated.
Biologists are getting tantalizingly close to launching life out of common chemicals, but at this moment it's largely at the SM hypothesis-level, not yet advanced far enough along to call it ATheory. That however, will be on the high-school biology text-books within the next 3 - 5 years, trust me!
And then, oh boy, what will they say? Lord: it'll be a blood-bath!
Yep: They do this every time! They hope to obfuscate the issue by this incessant conflation of the origins of original life and how that life, once developed, differentiated.
Biologists are getting tantalizingly close to launching life out of common chemicals, but at this moment it's largely at the SM hypothesis-level, not yet advanced far enough along to call it ATheory. That however, will be on the high-school biology text-books within the next 3 - 5 years, trust me!
And then, oh boy, what will they say? Lord: it'll be a blood-bath!
Trust me - we will be right there to attack your science-fiction.
Trust me - we will be right there to attack your science-fiction.
You're going to have to take your game up a notch or ten.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh no: Here we go again!
