There he goes again: This week Obama tells us he is NOT "redistributing wealth" (millionaires, dollars)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think the Pres and Dems are asking those that take 43-45% of the wealth out of the Economy, should contribute something, at least close to that percentage, for running the business of the Nation.
The hell it is. Those stupid ignorant people who do use the system, are complete uttere garbage. And there are many?
More so with this administration, because they can.
$3 Billion dollars of tax revenue....annually.....which will be spent in less than 24 hours. Someone, anyone, tell me what $3B will pay for in America? It won't build a cross-country or cross-state highway. It won't buy every child a set of encyclopedias. It won't retrofit a massive amount of houses for the disabled. (None of which he has proposed. What will he do with the money?)
In other words, the impact will be so miniscule that we'd never even know that an additional $3B was collected.
Barack Obama thinks you're stupid. He only wants you to hear "tax on millionaires" so that he can collect your vote. That's his only purpose.
{DING DING DING} We have a winner here. Obama likes them stupid, infact he counts on the stupid ones.
Yes he only tells people that in which he thinks they want to hear, then does as he plans, his agenda. He'll get the vote any way he can.
Wealth can be redistributed upward through monopoly business or dowanward through government programs. I preffer the latter because I am not nor ever intend to be a businessman.
Wealth can be redistributed upward through monopoly business or dowanward through government programs. I preffer the latter because I am not nor ever intend to be a businessman.
In otherwords, you are ready to accept that which you did not earn but which the government took from others. Generally the receipt of stolen goods is not something which society sees as a good thing. Why is it acceptable to you when it is the government doing the stealing?
There he goes again: This week Obama tells us he is NOT "redistributing wealth"
So, what's your opinion on the very clear redistribution of wealth proposed by Rep. Ryan and endorsed by Mitt Romney? That's an actual proposal, not one conjured in the middle of the night by the aluminum foil hat crowd.
In otherwords, you are ready to accept that which you did not earn but which the government took from others. Generally the receipt of stolen goods is not something which society sees as a good thing. Why is it acceptable to you when it is the government doing the stealing?
Government steals in both directions. For example, Michigan subsidizes homeowners by taxing business and rental property four times as much for schools. That's like a couple billion dollars a year redistributed to homeowners from everyone else.
And I've never heard any conservative complain about it - indeed, the nonhomestead tax was created by Republicans.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.