Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2012, 10:14 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,783,616 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

Obama's agenda has been almost exclusively devoted to taking money from "the rich" (that's almost anyone with a successful business and a payroll), and using it to give goodies to everyone else. And he admitted even before he became President, that his goal was to "spread the wealth around".

But now that people are beginning to realize what he's doing - and an election is just around the corner - Obama is now practicing some classic Orwellian doublethink. Though his actions and goals clearly haven't changed, suddenly now he's NOT trying to "redistribute wealth"... so he tells us this week.

Nothing has changed but the words. But somehow he expects us to believe him. And just forget about the last four years.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Obama: I'm not trying to 'redistribute wealth' | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner

Obama: I'm not trying to 'redistribute wealth'

by Joel Gehrke
Commentary Staff Writer

President Obama, who famously called for tax increases on the wealthy to "spread the wealth around," denied today that his tax increases on the rich are an attempt to "redistribute wealth."

"So these investments -- in things like education and research and health care -- they haven't been made as some grand scheme to redistribute wealth from one group to another," the president said today at Florida Atlantic University. "This is not some socialist dream," Obama added, as he called for tax increases on millionaires today to pay for those investments.

When he advocated the same plan in 2008, though, Obama described this "spread the wealth around" policy. "I’m gonna cut taxes a little bit more for the folks who are most in need and for the 5 percent of the folks who are doing very well – even though they’ve been working hard and I appreciate that – I just want to make sure they’re paying a little bit more in order to pay for those other tax cuts," he told Samuel Wurzelbacher (aka Joe the Plumber), who is now running for Congress.


(Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2012, 10:23 AM
 
867 posts, read 498,356 times
Reputation: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Obama's agenda has been almost exclusively devoted to taking money from "the rich" (that's almost anyone with a successful business and a payroll), and using it to give goodies to everyone else. And he admitted even before he became President, that his goal was to "spread the wealth around".

But now that people are beginning to realize what he's doing - and an election is just around the corner - Obama is now practicing some classic Orwellian doublethink. Though his actions and goals clearly haven't changed, suddenly now he's NOT trying to "redistribute wealth"... so he tells us this week.

Nothing has changed but the words. But somehow he expects us to believe him. And just forget about the last four years.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Obama: I'm not trying to 'redistribute wealth' | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner

Obama: I'm not trying to 'redistribute wealth'

by Joel Gehrke
Commentary Staff Writer

President Obama, who famously called for tax increases on the wealthy to "spread the wealth around," denied today that his tax increases on the rich are an attempt to "redistribute wealth."

"So these investments -- in things like education and research and health care -- they haven't been made as some grand scheme to redistribute wealth from one group to another," the president said today at Florida Atlantic University. "This is not some socialist dream," Obama added, as he called for tax increases on millionaires today to pay for those investments.

When he advocated the same plan in 2008, though, Obama described this "spread the wealth around" policy. "I’m gonna cut taxes a little bit more for the folks who are most in need and for the 5 percent of the folks who are doing very well – even though they’ve been working hard and I appreciate that – I just want to make sure they’re paying a little bit more in order to pay for those other tax cuts," he told Samuel Wurzelbacher (aka Joe the Plumber), who is now running for Congress.


(Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)
Believing Obama is a fool's errand. A bigger bag of trash never sat at the desk in the oval office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 10:33 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
I think the Pres and Dems are asking those that take 43-45% of the wealth out of the Economy, should contribute something, at least close to that percentage, for running the business of the Nation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 10:36 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,783,616 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
I think the Pres and Dems are asking those that take 43-45% of the wealth out of the Economy,
You mean the Government, right? Your description fits perfectly. Kudoes!

Quote:
should contribute something, at least close to that percentage, for running the business of the Nation.
Myabe they should just take a lot less, hmmm?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 10:52 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beatles4evr View Post
Believing Obama is a fool's errand. A bigger bag of trash never sat at the desk in the oval office.
Mr Van Winkle? That you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 11:00 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,123,773 times
Reputation: 9409
$3 Billion dollars of tax revenue....annually.....which will be spent in less than 24 hours. Someone, anyone, tell me what $3B will pay for in America? It won't build a cross-country or cross-state highway. It won't buy every child a set of encyclopedias. It won't retrofit a massive amount of houses for the disabled. (None of which he has proposed. What will he do with the money?)

In other words, the impact will be so miniscule that we'd never even know that an additional $3B was collected.

Barack Obama thinks you're stupid. He only wants you to hear "tax on millionaires" so that he can collect your vote. That's his only purpose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 03:44 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
State and local governments often redistribute wealth UPWARD yet I never hear anyone complain about that.

If someone's wealth is redistributed upward by government, shouldn't they be able to get some of it back?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,828,984 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beatles4evr View Post
Believing Obama is a fool's errand. A bigger bag of trash never sat at the desk in the oval office.
Except LBJ!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 03:47 PM
 
Location: South Dakota
2,608 posts, read 2,097,333 times
Reputation: 769
"Spread the wealth" is socialism no matter what Trayvons dad says....





“The goal of socialism is communism.”

Vladimir Lenin quotes (Russian Founder of the Russian Communist Party, leader of the Russian Revolution of 1917, 1870-1924)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2012, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
What "reinvestment" in education ? What taxes are going to be collected for education ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top