Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-12-2012, 03:40 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,333,016 times
Reputation: 5480

Advertisements

CALGARY — Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP said on Thursday it would more than double the size of its Trans Mountain oil pipeline with a $5-billion project to add 550,000 barrels per day of capacity to the line that carries oil sands crude to Vancouver and Washington’s Puget Sound.

The company said a recent “open season” held to gauge shipper support for an expansion of the line showed that shippers were willing to commit as much as 660,000 bpd to the expansion for a 20-year term

The revised project is larger than the $3.8-billion plan to double the size of the 300,000 bpd line that the company initially proposed in February before drawing back to look for additional customers willing to sign binding 20-year contracts to ship oil on Trans Mountain.

“We knew that as the project’s design was evolving it would allow for more commitments,” said Ian Anderson, president of Kinder Morgan Canada. “We also knew, or believed, that the market had some players in it … that might still be interested.”

Canadian oil producers have been urging development of a line to let them tap high-paying Asian markets and U.S. West Coast refineries. The majority of Canadian oil exports now flow to the U.S. Midwest, where a glut of crude at the Cushing, Oklahoma, storage hub has depressed prices.

Production from Alberta’s oil sands, the world’s third largest crude oil reserve, is set to nearly double to 3 million barrels per day by 2020.

The Trans Mountain expansion is one of several pipeline projects in the works as Canadian oil producers look to tap new markets and avoid the discounts they face at Cushing.

Enbridge Inc’s Northern Gateway project is also looking to move oil to a Pacific port, while Enbridge’s Gulf Access Project and TransCanada Corp’s controversial Keystone XL pipeline are looking to push oil sands crude to the refining cluster on the U.S. gulf coast.

All the projects are fully backed by producers
“There is overwhelming demand for these pipelines,” said Chad Friess, an analyst at UBS Securities. “It shows the urgency, in producers’ minds, to close these regional oil price (discounts).”

Trans Mountain, which takes oil to Vancouver and refineries in British Columbia and Washington, is the only pipeline carrying Alberta oil sands crude to the Pacific. Space on the line has been rationed for months as customers look to ship more oil than it can handle.

The latest project, which could be completed in 2017, will rival Enbridge’s planned 525,000 bpd Northern Gateway pipeline to take oil sands crude to a deepwater port at Kitimat, on British Columbia’s northern coast.

Northern Gateway has already been delayed more than a year as stiff opposition from environmentalists and aboriginal groups caused regulatory hearings to stretch out to two years.

Alarmed by the delay to a project it considers to be in the national interest, the federal government plans time limits on hearings. Anderson welcomed the new rules, but he said they will not change the need to seek the support of those affected by the project.

“There’s no doubt that I hope to benefit from those changes … but (the new rules) will not reduce or limit the amount of engagement and local-interest consideration that we will have to undertake,” he said.
Kinder Morgan plans to file for approval of the project in 2104 and construction could begin in 2016. The project will twin the existing line, add new pumping stations and expand its Port of Vancouver docks to handle additional tanker traffic.

Trans Mountain runs 1,150 kilometers (713 miles) from Edmonton, Alberta, to Vancouver.
Kinder Morgan to more than double size of Trans Mountain oil pipeline | Energy | News | Financial Post

Ok So here is another project that I hope the Green groups do not try to kill this off since it benfits both B.C. and Westren Washington..

I mean having the $5 Billion invested into the PNW economy and the binding 20-year contracts to both U.S. West Coast and Canadian Refineries means stable jobs for both Countries and they already have the line built and are just going to twin the route so it should have no issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2012, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,016 posts, read 12,585,178 times
Reputation: 9030
Well, it would be one heck of a lot better than the Gateway pipe. I predict the gateway will NEVER be built and that's a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2012, 10:17 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,333,016 times
Reputation: 5480
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucknow View Post
Well, it would be one heck of a lot better than the Gateway pipe. I predict the gateway will NEVER be built and that's a good thing.
Well Vancouver has the port ranked in 2006 as the largest port in Canada, the fourth-largest port on the West Coast of North America, and fifth-largest in North America overall But that is the shipping port and the one that Kinder Morgan uses to load the Oil tankers up is just across from port moody deeper in the Burrard Inlet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2012, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,290,033 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOlover View Post
CALGARY — Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP said on Thursday it would more than double the size of its Trans Mountain oil pipeline with a $5-billion project to add 550,000 barrels per day of capacity to the line that carries oil sands crude to Vancouver and Washington’s Puget Sound.

The company said a recent “open season” held to gauge shipper support for an expansion of the line showed that shippers were willing to commit as much as 660,000 bpd to the expansion for a 20-year term

The revised project is larger than the $3.8-billion plan to double the size of the 300,000 bpd line that the company initially proposed in February before drawing back to look for additional customers willing to sign binding 20-year contracts to ship oil on Trans Mountain.

“We knew that as the project’s design was evolving it would allow for more commitments,” said Ian Anderson, president of Kinder Morgan Canada. “We also knew, or believed, that the market had some players in it … that might still be interested.”

Canadian oil producers have been urging development of a line to let them tap high-paying Asian markets and U.S. West Coast refineries. The majority of Canadian oil exports now flow to the U.S. Midwest, where a glut of crude at the Cushing, Oklahoma, storage hub has depressed prices.

Production from Alberta’s oil sands, the world’s third largest crude oil reserve, is set to nearly double to 3 million barrels per day by 2020.

The Trans Mountain expansion is one of several pipeline projects in the works as Canadian oil producers look to tap new markets and avoid the discounts they face at Cushing.

Enbridge Inc’s Northern Gateway project is also looking to move oil to a Pacific port, while Enbridge’s Gulf Access Project and TransCanada Corp’s controversial Keystone XL pipeline are looking to push oil sands crude to the refining cluster on the U.S. gulf coast.

All the projects are fully backed by producers
“There is overwhelming demand for these pipelines,” said Chad Friess, an analyst at UBS Securities. “It shows the urgency, in producers’ minds, to close these regional oil price (discounts).”

Trans Mountain, which takes oil to Vancouver and refineries in British Columbia and Washington, is the only pipeline carrying Alberta oil sands crude to the Pacific. Space on the line has been rationed for months as customers look to ship more oil than it can handle.

The latest project, which could be completed in 2017, will rival Enbridge’s planned 525,000 bpd Northern Gateway pipeline to take oil sands crude to a deepwater port at Kitimat, on British Columbia’s northern coast.

Northern Gateway has already been delayed more than a year as stiff opposition from environmentalists and aboriginal groups caused regulatory hearings to stretch out to two years.

Alarmed by the delay to a project it considers to be in the national interest, the federal government plans time limits on hearings. Anderson welcomed the new rules, but he said they will not change the need to seek the support of those affected by the project.

“There’s no doubt that I hope to benefit from those changes … but (the new rules) will not reduce or limit the amount of engagement and local-interest consideration that we will have to undertake,” he said.
Kinder Morgan plans to file for approval of the project in 2104 and construction could begin in 2016. The project will twin the existing line, add new pumping stations and expand its Port of Vancouver docks to handle additional tanker traffic.

Trans Mountain runs 1,150 kilometers (713 miles) from Edmonton, Alberta, to Vancouver.
Kinder Morgan to more than double size of Trans Mountain oil pipeline | Energy | News | Financial Post

Ok So here is another project that I hope the Green groups do not try to kill this off since it benfits both B.C. and Westren Washington..

I mean having the $5 Billion invested into the PNW economy and the binding 20-year contracts to both U.S. West Coast and Canadian Refineries means stable jobs for both Countries and they already have the line built and are just going to twin the route so it should have no issues.
I have to wonder what is meant by Asian markets. Everybody knows that it is Chinese that is meant but this article calls it Asian. Maybe they are trying to skirt the American problem with the proposed pipeline that Obama is so against. This very thing is what was spoken about when the American pipeline was proposed. Isn't it something what competition can bring into existence?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top