Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-10-2012, 11:51 PM
 
Location: MASSACHUSETTS
744 posts, read 811,976 times
Reputation: 513

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
"The private sector's doing fine." - Barry O

But how the heck did you get a mortgage in Massachusetts with an income under $26K? Did you actually buy a house and how much was your down payment?
I lived at home and saved up 35k by spending almost nothing for 3 years, 25k for down payment, 10k for remodel, 8k tax credit used for remodeling, spend $300/mo for remodeling. I live in Leominster, MA which is about 30-40 minutes from Boston. My house 3b 2 ba was under 100k in a pretty nice neighborhood, I gutted it, new everything,so it was/is a fixer upper. Still not done but very close,I have a thread on it but have not updated it in a bit. I do all the work myself aside from plumbing and sometimes have help. I take home $400/wk and my mortgage w/ tax and ins is $500/m. I save $300-400/m. One day I will trade up and move back closer to Boston but I am happy where I am for now. Hope this answers your questions

Not all of MA is expensive, closer to Boston and a few other places I could never dream of buying a home unless in a ghetto or something though. Oh yeah and I did have a co-signer because I had no credit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
WTF housing can you get for say $500/month in Massachusetts?
Here in Leominster I bought a 3bed 2 bath fixer upper, my mortgage is $500 almost on the dot incl tax and ins. I have invested about 20-25,000 on tools,building materials and cost of plumbing, I do basically everything myself and search on Craigslist for good deals on things I need. In the next 3 months I'm building kitchen cabinets, putting a roof on and residing the house with hardiplank. So, in my case you can get a really nice house(by my standards) in a nice neighborhood 30-40min away from Boston(with little traffic). Realistically, you can get a decent 3b 2 ba home for 150k here in Leominster, double that and more in the suburbs of Boston.

Last edited by sturmgeist; 07-11-2012 at 12:11 AM.. Reason: add quote/response
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-10-2012, 11:55 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,598,969 times
Reputation: 1680
Quote:
Originally Posted by sturmgeist View Post
I lived at home and saved up 35k by spending almost nothing for 3 years, 25k for down payment, 10k for remodel, 8k tax credit used for remodeling, spend $300/mo for remodeling. I live in Leominster, MA which is about 30-40 minutes from Boston. My house 3b 2 ba was under 100k in a pretty nice neighborhood, I gutted it, new everything,so it was/is a fixer upper. Still not done but very close,I have a thread on it but have not updated it in a bit. I do all the work myself aside from plumbing and sometimes have help. I take home $400/wk and my mortgage w/ tax and ins is $500/m. I save $300-400/m. One day I will trade up and move back closer to Boston but I am happy where I am for now. Hope this answers your questions

Not all of MA is expensive, closer to Boston and a few other places I could never dream of buying a home unless in a ghetto or something though.
Nice!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2012, 07:19 AM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,201,923 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by sturmgeist View Post
I lived at home and saved up 35k by spending almost nothing for 3 years, 25k for down payment, 10k for remodel, 8k tax credit used for remodeling, spend $300/mo for remodeling. I live in Leominster, MA which is about 30-40 minutes from Boston. My house 3b 2 ba was under 100k in a pretty nice neighborhood, I gutted it, new everything,so it was/is a fixer upper. Still not done but very close,I have a thread on it but have not updated it in a bit. I do all the work myself aside from plumbing and sometimes have help. I take home $400/wk and my mortgage w/ tax and ins is $500/m. I save $300-400/m. One day I will trade up and move back closer to Boston but I am happy where I am for now. Hope this answers your questions

Not all of MA is expensive, closer to Boston and a few other places I could never dream of buying a home unless in a ghetto or something though. Oh yeah and I did have a co-signer because I had no credit.

Here in Leominster I bought a 3bed 2 bath fixer upper, my mortgage is $500 almost on the dot incl tax and ins. I have invested about 20-25,000 on tools,building materials and cost of plumbing, I do basically everything myself and search on Craigslist for good deals on things I need. In the next 3 months I'm building kitchen cabinets, putting a roof on and residing the house with hardiplank. So, in my case you can get a really nice house(by my standards) in a nice neighborhood 30-40min away from Boston(with little traffic). Realistically, you can get a decent 3b 2 ba home for 150k here in Leominster, double that and more in the suburbs of Boston.
I've done the same thing seven times before I built this home in 1994. I was flipping what I lived in before I knew that term. Living in dust most of my life. The kitchen here took about seven years to build, with all the side jobs, regular jobs and the 19 drawers I needed to build.

I have calculated out most of the transactions I did and other than the first three I didn't do much better than market appreciation when you factor in all the time and material you pour into these things. It never ends, in the 18 years I've been in this one I have remodeled a 1/3 of the original work already.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2012, 07:40 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,165,825 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
Thank you for your definition, it is useless for the purpose of this discussion.
Well, that would be in keeping with this thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
By definition, 50 percent of wage earners had net compensation less than or equal to the median wage, which is estimated to be $26,363.55 for 2010. Source
So?

It would appear you didn't understand this part of your source:

"The "raw" average wage,..."

I highlighted the operand special just for you. The reason your attempt at disinformation fails is because you didn't adjust the wages to the cost-of-living.

I can see why you would never do that, since it would destroy your argument.

The cost-of-living in the US is not uniform. Remember this is not Iceland (Population: 317,000) with one economy, this is the United States with several hundred economies running simultaneously.

Because of that fact which you and others continuously ignore, the reality is that sometimes you have this:

$26,000 = $60,000

and sometimes you get this:

$120,000 = $31,000

And what about those who by their own choice earn less than $26,000? Are you going to line them up and shoot them?

This is just another Liberal Penis Envy/Breast-implant Envy thread cloaked in the mantra of Compassion to hide the stench.

Challenging....

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2012, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,598,969 times
Reputation: 1680
Cool lol...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Well, that would be in keeping with this thread.



So?

It would appear you didn't understand this part of your source:


Mircea
By definition, 50 percent of wage earners had net compensation less than or equal to the median wage, which is estimated to be $26,363.55 for 2010. Source

No matter how you try, you cannot twist this data.

Valiant epic failure...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2012, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,483,709 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
By definition, 50 percent of wage earners had net compensation less than or equal to the median wage, which is estimated to be $26,363.55 for 2010. Source

No matter how you try, you cannot twist this data.

Valiant epic failure...
you are the one that is twisting


lets look at your TWISTY words

50% had a NET compensation (pay) less than OR EQUAL to the MEDIAN (50/50) wage

duhhhh


so lets' REALLY look at your words

the MEDIAN WAGE (individual) 26k...50% of wage earners earned more...50% earned less

that's why they call it MEDIAN

and many of those wage earners( TAX FORM FILERS) were RETIRIES, and TEENS

in FACT nearly 50% of ALL FILERS had a near ZERO tax liability....meaning nearly 50% OF ALL FILERS paid nearly zero in federal income taxes

the median household income is 51k

the op cant even get the topic straight

Last edited by workingclasshero; 07-11-2012 at 01:24 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2012, 10:21 PM
 
Location: MASSACHUSETTS
744 posts, read 811,976 times
Reputation: 513
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzards27 View Post
I've done the same thing seven times before I built this home in 1994. I was flipping what I lived in before I knew that term. Living in dust most of my life. The kitchen here took about seven years to build, with all the side jobs, regular jobs and the 19 drawers I needed to build.

I have calculated out most of the transactions I did and other than the first three I didn't do much better than market appreciation when you factor in all the time and material you pour into these things. It never ends, in the 18 years I've been in this one I have remodeled a 1/3 of the original work already.
I will not do this again. I like the satisfaction after I am done with a project but it's just too frustrating and I suck at construction. I did not do this to make a profit,just wanted a nice place and it is the only way I could do it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2012, 12:51 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,698,996 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
By definition, 50 percent of wage earners had net compensation less than or equal to the median wage, which is estimated to be $26,363.55 for 2010. Source

No matter how you try, you cannot twist this data.

Valiant epic failure...
And this is while Obama is president, a president who just created 800,000 new work visas for foreigners, who is encouraging cheap labor illegals to pour over the border to take jobs for low wages.

Obama is doing absolutely nothing to bring wages up, in fact he's doing all he can to do the opposite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2012, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,201,923 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by sturmgeist View Post
I will not do this again. I like the satisfaction after I am done with a project but it's just too frustrating and I suck at construction. I did not do this to make a profit,just wanted a nice place and it is the only way I could do it
I did it to fill any gaps I had in employment, I was a carpenter/kitchen installer/builder and often found free time between contracts. The work kept me out of the bars at night and was like banking equity. My first deal, I turned a $24k home around in two years and sold it for $38k back in 1975. By 1994 I was mortgage free on this 2700 sq ft, $400k home.

LOL, funny thing, wife used to walk around here muttering, "never again", as we built this thing, time passed and now she is saying, "next time we'll do this or that"....

Last edited by buzzards27; 07-12-2012 at 01:03 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2012, 12:36 PM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,239,617 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat View Post
Romney started STAPLES.

Staples employs over 70,000 people.

Obama turned down the Keystone Pipeline. Romney will approve it. 20,000 well paying jobs just like that.

What's Barack going to do?

Just make things worse.
The 20,000 jobs is a lie. Republican lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top