Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-12-2012, 01:13 PM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,378,099 times
Reputation: 10251

Advertisements

Romney is vastly more concerned with low income earners than Obama is.

Obama NEEDS low income earners who are dependent on government. It is in his self interest to prevent social mobility in America.

Romney Needs a robust economy where government shrinks and private enterprise is robust. This gives more low income earners more opportunities to gain wages and advance toward middle class and even into the upper income earner levels.

So the short answer? YES.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-12-2012, 01:15 PM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,378,099 times
Reputation: 10251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
The 20,000 jobs is a lie. Republican lie.

LOL> Obama saying he wanted to bring down the debt was what? A loving statement of truth from Americas Dear Leader?

geez
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2012, 01:18 PM
 
3,448 posts, read 3,132,073 times
Reputation: 478
I'd back Trump before Obama in a snap...... esp in these economy related concerns
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2012, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,344,311 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
Romney: Campaign ‘Not Concerned About the Very Poor’ - ABC News


72,419,266 Americans or 50% of wage earners had net compensation less than or equal to the median wage, which is estimated to be $26,363.55 for 2010. - Source


Source

Who do you feel Romney's economic and tax policies will benefit?
Why should the POTUS have policies to help people just because they don't earn a lot of money? If these people are not happy with their situation they need to do something about it and stop expecting the government to do it for them. I'm sick to death of this liberal horse $hit suggested in the OP.

Last edited by Rick Roma; 07-12-2012 at 01:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2012, 01:22 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,280,030 times
Reputation: 3296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
LOL> Obama saying he wanted to bring down the debt was what? A loving statement of truth from Americas Dear Leader?

geez
Obama is a liar and few can deny it anymore. Simply follow what he does, not what he says.
I think Romney is vastly skilled compared to Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2012, 01:26 PM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,200,962 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by stargazzer View Post
I'd back Trump before Obama in a snap...... esp in these economy related concerns
LOL, you get two for one with Trump, him AND that thing living ion his head. For the life of my I dont understand how Trump gets away with doing that "simply marvelous" Billy Crystal character Fernando all the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2012, 01:33 PM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,378,099 times
Reputation: 10251
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB View Post
Obama is a liar and few can deny it anymore. Simply follow what he does, not what he says.
I think Romney is vastly skilled compared to Obama.
I thikn my dead cat is more skilled at running a government than Obama....


But I agree with you. Romney can and will do a very good guy. I am looking forward to voting for him!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2012, 01:46 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,451,622 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
Romney is vastly more concerned with low income earners than Obama is.

Obama NEEDS low income earners who are dependent on government. It is in his self interest to prevent social mobility in America.

Romney Needs a robust economy where government shrinks and private enterprise is robust. This gives more low income earners more opportunities to gain wages and advance toward middle class and even into the upper income earner levels.

So the short answer? YES.

Workers with low-wage dead-end jobs will mostly become worse off under Romney.

Their jobs have little (wage, advancement) upside potential in even a booming economy, while their rents will soar and they will have fewer dollars left to spend on other things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top