Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-23-2012, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
Don't embarass yourself, further. Take the time to learn about Social Security. Current events. Economic activity. Then you'll understand better. Doing that will make whichever "rant" you choose more relevant. Really.
How about you learning us about Social Security since you seem to know so much about it. How long have you been paying on SS? How long has the Congress been spending what they considered surplus in the program each year? You must know quite a bit about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2012, 02:47 PM
 
3,345 posts, read 3,074,946 times
Reputation: 1725
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
Don't embarass yourself, further. Take the time to learn about Social Security. Current events. Economic activity. Then you'll understand better. Doing that will make whichever "rant" you choose more relevant. Really.
Yes, just hit the bong and trust in government to fix it.... the Democlown solution

Been doing a great job lately.....

Try to get informed and learn what is happening
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 02:49 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,205,540 times
Reputation: 5481
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
I think we need to give more tax breaks to the wealthy.
Please name a single tax break that is available to the wealthy that is not available to the middle class as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 02:50 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,783,616 times
Reputation: 4174
Ponzi schemes such as Social Security (that is, schemes were you get someone's vote by promising to pay him with Other People's Money), always break down when you start running out of Other People's Money.

And even when you "adjust" things so you can get more of Other People's Money... that doesn't make the Ponzi scheme any more sound. It merely delays the crash.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 02:51 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
TRANSLATION: I can't refute what he said, but I hate it anyway, so I'll call names instead and hope someone believes HE is wrong instead of me.
Then please post something of substance and join in the discussion to show us what you know. How does higher gas prices drive wages down? If anything it increases the cost of living thus increase the demand to drive wages up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 03:01 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,783,616 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Then please post something of substance
See post #4.

Quote:
How does higher gas prices drive wages down?
Nice try at changing the question to a different subject and pretending it's the same. If I had been caught supporting a false premise (High energy prices DON'T worsen Social Security's finances), I might try the same dodge... if I had zero intellectual integrity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 03:06 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
See post #4.
I did, but that doesnt explain it. The fact that you buy less of something doesnt affect your income, it affects your expenses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Nice try at changing the question to a different subject and pretending it's the same. If I had been caught supporting a false premise (High energy prices DON'T worsen Social Security's finances), I might try the same dodge... if I had zero intellectual integrity.
Actually I responded directly to the quotes in the OP

Social Security’s finances worsened in part because high energy prices suppressed wages, a trend the trustees see as continuing.

So its now intellectually dishonest to discuss statements made, or is it that you dont have an answer and thus you decided to ignore the question and go off onto attack land.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 03:18 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,187,569 times
Reputation: 23892
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
Don't embarass yourself, further. Take the time to learn about Social Security. Current events. Economic activity. Then you'll understand better. Doing that will make whichever "rant" you choose more relevant. Really.
Take time to use spell check and spell embarrass correctly. Really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 03:32 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,783,616 times
Reputation: 4174
BTW, something not mentioned in the OP...

The Social Security Trust fund, and other such funds "held" by the government, are supposed to have the money "contributed" by taxpayers, being held for when they retire.

But in fact, they are empty - nothing but a lot of government IOUs. The government has "borrowed" that money, and spent it on other, unrelated things.

In order for these Trust Funds to "run dry" in 2033, as the OP describes, first all that money has to be paid back into them, so it can then be paid out to the actual Social Security recipients and recipients to the other trust funds. If that happens, then the funds will get zeroed out in 2033, as the OP says.

How much has been borrowed out of the Social Security Trust fund (and other funds)?

Answer: 31% of the entire National Debt is owed to these Trust Funds today.

Have you heard of any plans for the government to pay off 31% of the National Debt lately? Not increase it, as they have been doing for the last half century or more... PAY IT OFF.

Neither have I.

Yet the only way the Trust Funds can live long enough to "run dry" in 2033, is for the govt to pay off that much of the National Debt. Or to borrow enough ADDITIONAL MONEY from other sources, to restock the Trust Funds and make the scheduled payments to the Trust Fund recipients.

Have you heard any plans for the government to borrow an amount equivalent to 31% of the National Debt IN ADDITION to what they're borrowing already?

Again, neither have I.

So, what's the solution to this problem?

I haven't heard that, either.

----------------------------------

SOURCE: Current and Back Issues: Daily Treasury Statement: Publications & Guidance: Financial Management Service Table III C. See "Intragovernmental Holdings" as a fraction of "Total Public Debt Outstanding".

Last edited by Little-Acorn; 04-23-2012 at 03:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 03:37 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,210 posts, read 107,904,670 times
Reputation: 116153
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Those trust funds will now run dry in 2033, according to a report issued by the trustees that oversee the massive retirement and disability program.[/color][/i]


Then there is this...

Social Security’s finances worsened in part because high energy prices suppressed wages, a trend the trustees see as continuing.


Really?? I thought the economy was on the rebound.


And in case anyone thought that Social Security is fully funded by the taxpayers...

Social Security is financed[b] by a 6.2 percent tax on the [/B]first $110,100 in wages. It is paid by both employers and workers. Congress temporarily reduced the tax on workers to 4.2 percent for 2011 and 2012, though the program’s finances are being made whole through increased government borrowing.
Social Security is an impending train wreck that is easily averted.
1) Cancel SS payments to the wealthy, who will readily admit (I've heard them do it!) that they don't need their monthly check from the gummint.

2) Extend the SS tax beyond the first $110,000 in wages, DUH! They could even lower the 2nd increment a bit, to, say, 4%, to make the pill easier to swallow. Do you think Bill Gates is going to miss that extra 4% on his several billion/year? Hell, no, but the SS fund sure will be happy to rake in his share to keep itself propped up another few years!

These measures have been discussed in Congress, but they haven't made it into legislation, AFAIK, and haven't been passed. This is the simplest, most painless way of fixing SS. Please, folks, write to your representatives and senators. It's easy enough to do on the internet, they all take email. If you write a good letter, it will get noticed. I wrote one to one of my senators (on another matter), and his aid later told me it generated a lot of discussion in the office. It's easy enough to look up online who your Congressbods are, there's no excuse for not writing them these days, it's so easy, just a keystroke away. You want SS to be there for you, don't you? Well it won't, unless you take democracy into your own hands. Those of you who are AARP age may also want to write AARP about this.

P.S. LIttle-Acorn, what you post is pathetic and outrageous. It CAN be fixed, however. Thanks so much for the info.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top