Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-27-2012, 03:59 PM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,496,683 times
Reputation: 3510

Advertisements

Quote:
Before September 11, 2001, Attorney General John A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t failed to make counterterrorism a priority or to grant the FBI the counterterrorism funding it claimed to need. (See his May 10, 2001, memo here (.pdf)) After September 11th, under the guise of fighting terrorism, Attorney General John A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t and his Justice Department drafted laws and enacted policies that granted sweeping new powers to the executive branch while reducing the powers of the judiciary and Congress and curtailing the rights of the people. To avoid meaningful debate, he capitalized on fears of terrorism and characterized himself and supporters of the new laws and executive branch policies as the true patriots who were doing everything possible to protect their country. In contrast, he accused those who cast doubt on the constitutionality of the new laws and policies of aiding the terrorists.
Source: John ********'s Legacy

I thought it might be useful in light of the whining about current U.S. Attorney Eric Holder to re-visit President "W" Bush's disinterest in protecting our nation from terrorist attacks and then his own attack on our freedom and lessening of national security via his own actions and the actions of extremist U.S. Attorney General John A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t. Many of the radical measures pushed forward by Bush/A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t are at the core of the whines about Eric Holder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-27-2012, 04:03 PM
 
3,064 posts, read 2,639,791 times
Reputation: 968
Why do you keep putting spacers in his name?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2012, 04:04 PM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,496,683 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Why do you keep putting spacers in his name?
Because the software blocked-out A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t when I didn't. Don't know why that happens, but I had to edit the post so that the name appeared in some form. The title of the discussion could not be edited and that's why you see the *****
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2012, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,535,499 times
Reputation: 7807
John ********: Beat by a dead man in his last campaign for the Senate. Boy...that's gotta hurt!

I thought ******** was the worst Attorney General we'd ever had. That is, until I saw the guy who followed him.

And, of course, like nearly everyone else in the Bush administration, he'd gotten SIX student and 1 occupational draft deferments during the Vietnam War.

(Bleeping out his name is just ridiculous! What? Does it look too much like ass?)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2012, 04:25 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,944,845 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
Source: John ********'s Legacy

I thought it might be useful in light of the whining about current U.S. Attorney Eric Holder to re-visit President "W" Bush's disinterest in protecting our nation from terrorist attacks and then his own attack on our freedom and lessening of national security via his own actions and the actions of extremist U.S. Attorney General John A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t. Many of the radical measures pushed forward by Bush/A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t are at the core of the whines about Eric Holder.
Maybe if the OP were to be intellectually honest he would go all the way back to Janet Reno's legacy as AG under the impeached President Clinton.

Oklahoma City
WACO

Oh wait, never mind, Eric Holder was covering up for his bosses even back then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2012, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Chesterfield,Virginia
4,919 posts, read 4,836,448 times
Reputation: 2659
@$hcroft
a s h c r o f t
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 05:16 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Maybe if the OP were to be intellectually honest he would go all the way back to Janet Reno's legacy as AG under the impeached President Clinton.

Oklahoma City
WACO

Oh wait, never mind, Eric Holder was covering up for his bosses even back then.
Yes! Reno's legacy is "killer of women and children"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 05:30 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Maybe if the OP were to be intellectually honest he would go all the way back to Janet Reno's legacy as AG under the impeached President Clinton.

Oklahoma City
WACO


Just what did she have to do with Oklahoma City?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,349,276 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
Source: John ********'s Legacy

I thought it might be useful in light of the whining about current U.S. Attorney Eric Holder to re-visit President "W" Bush's disinterest in protecting our nation from terrorist attacks and then his own attack on our freedom and lessening of national security via his own actions and the actions of extremist U.S. Attorney General John A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t. Many of the radical measures pushed forward by Bush/A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t are at the core of the whines about Eric Holder.
I always love these pathetic deflection attempts?

Eric Holder?

But....But....BUT what about George W. Bush??!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 08:24 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,017,688 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Just what did she have to do with Oklahoma City?
Research Timothy McVeigh's motives for the Murrah building bombing - Waco was right up there at the top.

On the other hand - that is a valid question so long as you are consistent and don't subscribe to the "America deserved 9/11" point of view.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top