Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-02-2012, 11:54 AM
 
49 posts, read 33,492 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

And what is troubling with this situation is that the democrats are opposing this. What is the problem with a candidate having to show his original birth records to prove natural born Citizenship? What I had a problem with is what one democrat said which was this:

” It’s racial and I really don’t want to talk about it. I really don’t. It doesn't deserve to be lifted up and discussed. It really doesn't. It’s a ridiculous piece of legislation.”

This bill has absolutely nothing to do about race. Why do liberals always play the race card?


“Born in the USA” Bill Takes Another Step Forward « CBS St. Louis

http://house.mo.gov/billtracking/bil...rf/HB1046P.PDF
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-02-2012, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,645 posts, read 38,636,263 times
Reputation: 11780
You'll have until 2017 to keep up this Quixotic quest of yours............
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 12:03 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,179,016 times
Reputation: 18824
Well that does it....Obama had better resign when he gets this news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 12:03 PM
 
15,047 posts, read 8,867,870 times
Reputation: 9509
Another birther failure in the making...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 12:15 PM
 
26,562 posts, read 14,434,478 times
Reputation: 7421
and if it passes and holds up constitutionally............

then they'll have to accept a state certified hawaiian COLB.

full faith and credit clause of the constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Point Hope Alaska
4,320 posts, read 4,781,432 times
Reputation: 1146
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
and if it passes and holds up constitutionally............

then they'll have to accept a state certified hawaiian COLB.

full faith and credit clause of the constitution.
That is absolutely meaningless WHEN A FORGERY IS INVOLVED!!


It is obvious it is a poor forgery- Even Obama is trying to distance himself from that worthless piece of crap!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 12:20 PM
 
49 posts, read 33,492 times
Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
and if it passes and holds up constitutionally............

then they'll have to accept a state certified hawaiian COLB.
Not true. It has been found to be a forgery. They would probably ask to inspect other birth records to legitimize it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 12:21 PM
Sco
 
4,259 posts, read 4,916,911 times
Reputation: 3373
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
and if it passes and holds up constitutionally............

then they'll have to accept a state certified hawaiian COLB.

full faith and credit clause of the constitution.
Exactly, I have never seen any birther even attempt to address this point. As long as Hawaii states that the COLB is legit, no state will be able to challenge that even if they pass dozens of silly birther laws. The Hawaiian COLB even says this at the bottom of the document - it has a statement that says the COLB is prima facie evidence of the birth in any court proceeding.

Missouri or any other state has no standing to dispute the documents issued by another state. As long as Hawaii says that Obama was born there, that is the end of it as far as any court is concerned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 12:22 PM
 
5,524 posts, read 9,935,880 times
Reputation: 1867
So when he provides them with a certified copy does this shut birthers up? DOUBT IT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 12:31 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,917,108 times
Reputation: 12828
Despite the protesting of the usual suspects and their all too regular projections it is not "racist" to wish to insure the integrity of the election process.

There is little chance of this legislation making it into law because there is no way the politically ambitious Democrat Governor Jay Nixon would be willing to sign this legislation even if it did pass. It is unlikely to garner enough voted for a veto over-ride.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top