Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Rather than start a discussion about the system I would like to know who thinks are tax system as it is actually works well.
My answer is a simple no. I do not know how to set this as a poll but would be happy if someone set it up as a poll
No it doesn't b/c it isn't progressive enough. There needs to be a fair cap on what the gov't is allowed to take from you, and there needs to be an understanding that every dollar of income is not created equal, and so needs to be taxed accordingly.
Rather than start a discussion about the system I would like to know who thinks are tax system as it is actually works well.
My answer is a simple no. I do not know how to set this as a poll but would be happy if someone set it up as a poll
Rather than start a discussion about the system I would like to know who thinks are tax system as it is actually works well.
My answer is a simple no. I do not know how to set this as a poll but would be happy if someone set it up as a poll
Apparently your school system works just as well as our tax system.
To answer your question though while it does work to collect money for the government it does not work to actually do anything positive IMO.
People forget that complexity makes for regressivity, because only the rich can afford the armies of tax lawyers to lower their taxes. So what is libs typical answer to the problem of regressive taxation? Why, more complexity of course. Tax credits for having kids, tax credits for hiring people, etc.
I think taxes need to be addressed first and then right after that is done address spending. Hard do a budget unless you know what your income is. Most forms of tax reform are predicted to actually bring in more revenue while most of us would pay less, amazing ain't it. Which begs the question, why hasn't it been done, is it because the rich and powerful do not want it? The answer is for us the Voters to DEMAND it.
People forget that complexity makes for regressivity, because only the rich can afford the armies of tax lawyers to lower their taxes. So what is libs typical answer to the problem of regressive taxation? Why, more complexity of course. Tax credits for having kids, tax credits for hiring people, etc.
Is it? My reply is no tax credits, for anyone, after all we are talking about Fair Taxation for ALL.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
